I: Definition of Terms

• Personal Topic A quick topic title for the following outline case that is neither name nor non explanatory and for authorship memory in clearly outline needed points there of.
• Opening Statement A single sentence that is the non argument statement presented to the case in initial and first words, for judgmental query in strict allowance to close with argument.
• Opening Argument A single sentence that is the neither statement presented to the case in initial and first words, for judgmental query in strict allowance to close with a statement.
• Additional Addendum Any in between notes and directive the case party needs to outline or make the case after opening and before closing with in reason to directives shown.
• Evidence Overview All pertaining matters to the case of taxable retroactive transgression that maybe required per quo cited during a notable case consideration of occurrences.
• Hypothesis Holdings Any actual scientific hypothesis preformed before the case ensues that may/will be presented as fact basis to the building of reason to directives shown.
• Closing Statement A single sentence that is the non argument statement lasting remark upon the closing of the case at judgmental happening case derivatives or audited triumph.
• Closing Argument A single sentence that is the neither statement derived out of a case success in direction to appoint probable positions of closing triumphantly opens new cases.
• Case Number A sequential or unique (and related uniquely) identifying word consisting of numerical and/or alphabet that is only significant to cases in scope of this organized document.
• Case Listing The bulk information of this document that overviews the parts to each case needed in involvement and contains the majority help for benefactor during open to close.
• Case Flowchart The cohesive construct of case to case in co-existing collective that presents each case from one to all in connection as a whole to achieve each and all case in cross filing.

II: Case Listing

Personal Topic:

Friendships arenot family, and vice versa, two a house hold head count, and opportunity totruly prolong the choices in experiences of corrective environmental decisions,not the loss of health goes on in weather or not.

Opening Argument:

The riddle to pay yourself adult child support in a nationaloil spill crisis on the coast is similar to the advent of house hold personsopportunity to help one another and/or not help a question on medicalassistance as it would be in assisted, as in heaven, pertains to gained knownknowledge to be applicable while under hold and not the ladder, left abroad andexplained as away team still present and imposed in second decisions of biasoutstanding parties.

Additional Addendum:

To be included in family unit is to be vulnerable as wouldbe as expressed as same house and hold behind lock and key, or maybe morelucrative such as neglect in health is ignorant, but in arrogant it is abusiveintentions when would be knows how to better for themselves, then lets inanother as ignorant as themselves, and not fake fated what can not be takenback in imposed. Secrets are ashortcoming but if secrets are not your own then the short coming needs to berelayed and vulnerable persons to reason help one another in a situationunknown, rather then kept for scenario based outcomes to be profit of neitheras vulnerable unspotted, and unwilling to adapt let in, rather hold up a let goand show for fended for self last minute and not given the time in disposestheoretical for actual involvement. Not bad meaning bad, but bad meaning good,for instance if your shown what is bad, and the informant is display of what isbad as well, and expressed either waiver the good or the bad among others butare not present in a community view other then the shelter of the unablereference, only a family member would be able fate not a holding guard up formisinforming you to be purposely discern when it is you speak which is what andthen parting crowds of good or bad, with the educator still informs bothpresence and if your unintentional miss-mentions arise fault may still l beorder of that what identify with from those that which remain let vulnerabilityshow as family rather then leaving the dry high hired both intentions for thenow missing uninspired for predisposed lapped leashing. Any two traces ofseeking this is considerably a vulnerability similar to a community question ofeducation itself, and inspired learning, where we are allowed to find more andmore ways to learn and even go to school and fix what ever we find a failure,or rather repeat exactly what we will where if needed to complete, do. Also double informative measure wherequestions of corrective response maybe not even sought more imposed to learn,need be rule of measure for injective intentions that do not humble themselvesto vulnerable least the same house hold or aspire differently, and runningmentions especially with conductive reference might not as well be influence tothe cause, where as well apart is still as well, but ought is at expense ofderive the reason to run on not shopped its intention will for two lonepersons of persons in interaction of what is a minor hood and/or adult/hooddifference in timely fashioned education to community conduct standards ofbeing active part in, where house member or just dog walker. Resisting care isa huge example of what grandiose thinking is as a disorder and not just an egomaybe, as they may. I myself, restrictedallowed care in my self come in until I really talked one on one with askingwhat that word grandiose meant with the doctor who just expressed I was. I had apparently seen it before but I didntknow the definition. In short, I had tosomehow find out to take off the face I was just wearing but he left me nooptions. Classic example of nonparticipant, a mild grandiose as it is not total denial of health servicesoffered to me, as I was in a hospital.None the less, its a disorder because I was only health inhibitingmyself, it was not pride or egotistical praise at the office, and it was ahospital and resistance to accept help.The doctor said in short you think you got it all figured out when, andyou dont need help. Extreme version isexcessive force going in verses the bad attitude between communications thesame displeased. Punkd a show about making celebrities whomare on camera as their profession, becoming candid is preying upon onesspecial. This is a profession however,not a health disability or slow in nature growing rebounds. Yet in still, preying on someone is show, andthen is a grandiosity of the 2^nd person, rather then the 1^stperson type that I have had, but honestly does not appear until in the way, asgenetic in other illness that disorders, it is not seen by 1^st personlike living in a bubble. It is not a egowhen you do understand for reading material, but it is understood comes acrossas passionately egotistical on a constant basis is logic of life. If you grandiosity is for lack of a betterterm bi-curiously, then it maybe appears genetic, but is the mass whom wontstop the ego, really just a influence miss-justice like disordered. For instance fly somewhere father beyond thenspace, and need all modes of transportation involved to achieve this next generationplace and return and find the wave or general essence in the feel or the airaround intelligence automatically pushing at somewhere like splitting an atomfor a bomb, or the large building in the world to cities, the strongeststructure to architects. These maychange but find your reference in Buzz Arden, happen to speak with him aboutastronauts and learn this from what I express, egos are fine, but health detrimentalconduct is blind and Punkd a life is special to be prey upon, whether anarrogant attack or ignorant learning curve.Allow that outstanding party to have choice even when you retell yourday different or you might just be a bird on the Dawn bottle, whom found Dawnwill work nicely in those situations, for feathers too! Maybe family finds away in quicker, then running two stretch lengths of under not so result coveredtime it takes for adult to mature from minor, is quite enough from a falseAmerican Government on United States soil purposely extracting birds form theirhouse hold Dawn family only to double back AND NOT TELL US NEXT TIME IT IS NOTOIL, it is gasoline, best cleans them.Wave because the bird wont know what either of chemical it comes with isdoing but will feel the effects is best not be left in misinformed and missedthe help land all because you were told oil but left to never find Dawn when thegas hint was your best tardy anyway expression.

Closing Statement:

Two mentions of two house hold members whom twice hide trueaddenda each and double back may positively be info referenced a outside thehouse and hold party or two when twice what is injective secreted this attemptto conceal and remove sensitive data got it wrong outside or inside measurableable parameters and has displayed doubling back yet in still no exposure of thesecret where way would have found first noted, lies again to distract, per parquos each of the two members, displaying the re-mission, may all not be in forreference of family members before or after adult honor as minor healthinclusion when and still note not, what may very well be asking as well for arelief in surrounding ones time to in juncture of critic or care familiar,family, partial to neither their fault continues then displays as the healthproblem for outstanding parties to present a logical approach and stake a manas Earth incurable issues not lengthy lawn set civilian civilizer.

Personal Topic:

Extra order forprotection by fire marshal on divorcee homes should be paced that shares wallsthereof with the deceased.

Opening Argument:

In a finalization of divorce both parties each acquired aseparate home living space of their own yet, deceased now as both parties are,either or maybe seen at one anothers from time to time with the other partypresent as well and therefore by which way one home shares fire insurance thenso may share impersonation by activity monitoring and lack of presence such asphone call, I am requesting any insurance shared for fire liability also bestead fast as living D.N.A. samples that could had been.

Additional Addendum:

A call for extra ordinary protection on the deceased, asboth parties have, D.N.A samples that by the marshaled law party in her handwrittenand licked envelope remain by in share possible impersonated by overseeingparties and that the same living or deceased be protected from D.N.A. matching. Grass motes, a.k.a. a lawn surrounding and asingle dwelling home, are not as effective as water motes for fire spreading,however it is usually the case that natural large forest fires are the onesthat catch home to home flames, and not small single home fires. This isbecause of a mote whether grass or, and there this in the Minnetonka area,water ones.

Closing Statement:

.While we may not D.N.A match the dead, the living may beenough to speak for deceased parties when shared liability in fire marshalassuredly higher risk for potential out of pocket damage and association, suchthat even in different jurisdiction the day still questions after death innon-commercial ties whom would or may wish to forensic acquire such a sample inmy possession for a parenting party require acquired knowledge of 3^rdparties as to position diversity before said party is excluded in any analysisall possible be included for the deeds fate not with us.

Personal Topic:

The man is who heis, and the association is not who it was not.

Opening Argument:

A child found in a street bleeding by arriving ambulances shouldnot be allowed against their better judgment to return the child to a man whois raining and raving outside a home for claims of give me my son, least ason it was, whom the ambulance stitched the scrotum of noticing a missingtesticle, while the mother presumably is taken away to be questioned by thepolice.

Additional Addendum:

To discover the uncovering information of newspaper.com asfact or fiction by microfiche of the news paper whether or not it was releasedin an Ohio legal new paper stated in a 1979 article, my birth year, Infantgenital mauled by cat while baby sitters watch over the child. Find out whether or not a all day operationchannel is normal on cable television, then buy in which it adheres to a racetrack computer software sale advertisement, cover charge hosted by police whileIm loosing my lunch thinking people are more and more into health these dayswhy not open heart surgery channel.

Closing Statement:

Found outside, with two city sidewalk blocks replacedshowing concrete poured after the original sidewalk as slightly off color dueto loosing all my blood yet to turn purple, that I do in my crib after handedback to Tom, acknowledgement of the household or placement of found and thestatement by Tom to the rest of my life in his, and on paper show for the facthe and whom held me, walked me out, are my parents, as stated give me back myson should not have happened by in fact, found on the street, and in need ofmedical care then the ambulance is Hollywood, reason the newspaper clippingsshow Ohio and not Minnesota, preformed by over 20 extras on a Minnesota street.

Personal Topic:

Supportingevidence of a monopoly in acquisition to my intentional trail continues.

Opening Argument:

The Microsoft store does not sell software, let along aspecific software, of which I once found not in a store, for the first boxmeans of sold of three different boxes, each time, of software not available intheir own M.O.A. store, even once, as a salesman expressed, buy it online,clear vision and plain view, empty wall to the same effect an operating system,still sought in sealed original box, has yet to be discovered for a 800$ priceon Christmas of the year of its release, has also turned up more then a fewreturns to internet dealers providing descriptions that mislead my purchase..

Additional Addendum:

I want a sealed box original so I know pirates didnt touchit, I have been seeking it ever since I bought it on a computer when I asked,the man behind the counter said it comes with it on the system, I dont get adisc. As a Minneapolisbusiness, I dont know what the legitimacy of that was but I suppose I had thereceipt at that point when I realized I dont have the disc and could havereturned it. I think the 800$ price tagthat prior year is why. I also believemy first acquired VS6 discs are a clever fake.Done up so much that it have the packaging from a real one, minus thematerials, or even box, I have acquired two more since and in a lifetime workedon 11 different others such as employers, but being of the same version, Ifound two different boxes, to total three not once seemingly correct. I asked Microsoft as soon as they got astore, I dont know where else in the world they may likely had one, but inMinnesota, I believe M.O.A. was the first, and .NET was about at the time, Iqueried to the effect seeking where to buy (the store is obviously sheiktablets bare store displays of empty wall with few sales men competing acrossthe mall hallway with Apple) the salesman said try online, they do not sellsoftware at this store.

Sky Mall Article on Microsoft Revenue at Peak

500,000,000,000 a week reported in income

Using the calc.exe from Windows XP:

71428571428.571428571428571428571 a day

2976190476.1904761904761904761905 a hour

49603174.603174603174603174603175 a minute

826719.57671957671957671957671958 a second

826.71957671957671957671957671958 a millisecond

23809523809.523809523809523809524 a business day

333333333333.33333333333333333328 a two weeks pay

Closing Statement:

A few small countries changed their local dialect from theirown language to their second language because of computers in the 21^stcentury boom more easily and readily network use of English, as well, 3^rdworld countries asking for money for water, suited every local school withcomputers as if neither poor, and even every household in America that washesitant to buy a second car for their teen age children, sprung the same pricefor computers in a economic two fiscal inclinational histories of redlinedcomputer transaction sales to a product hub of distribution, the self roast ofMicrosoft overflowed buffers.

Personal Topic:

Family unitstogether have the right to the privacy of quarters to be supportive but nolonger should a second grant to those in the community least a doctor is ableto extend.

Opening Argument;

Some in their decisions of supporting projection in familyunits also portray a public projection and to be thankful for what is not theirjob they should take heed to whom is neither their allowance, recognizing, themental health portion of the in for reference.

Additional Addendum;

Just in a family or neighborhood alike is the standingreason for age limit of minor and adult, with expectations, but neither beingwith community to allotted natural disaster relief when one would choose to besocial rather then express their not at the situation maybe helps themselvesout more then their required responsibility under house and hold however doesnot extend their decisions with the community to projection above and beyondthe a lot time necessary they maybe a cause of and separation becomesperquisite to help and health whether individual or natural disaster. Those in a natural disaster are the wreakedin relief to what is occurring and those around outside the natural disasterimmediate in surroundings are the strong in relief to were not in and may handhelp like many do when the clear is safe.Those who choose to remain in the disaster are not greater a reliefblind of victimized, and thus the community need to those who choose their willto just help and those whom maybe make career, none the less when misunderstoodis shadowed by disaster.

Closing Argument;

Adult child support cases are much like mental health issuesto the community for the fact they go hand and hand with due process incompleteto be tracking where best fits the standing court appearance that can not be achild alone, neither the mental health issued stance if not the individualsthemselves.

Personal Topic:

The immunity ofman in the cloud may not count for my defenses.

Opening Argument;

Cancer donations are for the cause of cancer, in somestatements and for the cure of cancer in another, by their statement, the moneyis not going to learn the cause to fight the cure but rather when not placeddirectly in funding these two are appropriate avocations in a lesson wellsomeone elses such that the immunity shall not count in defense, as it wouldbe a weakness.

Additional Addendum;

Explanation of the broad ranged generalization of immunityover running with up to speed everyones basic understanding of cancer, as itis not rightfully printed on death certificates. Then an overview of how it may relate to abandage use similar in counting, where as no matter the amount of ailment, theimmunity does not count then nor should a doctor or relate to a patient theirmeans by in which shared immunity such as the cloud as a metaphorical pancreasfights absent of the count, always working toward resolve, not always found forinstance of infection with bandaging.That such to be healthily understanding the immunity short comings in ainstance of infection kept a wound open and a bandage means not resolve untilthe infection is, then by in which way we waiver cancer with out a factor ofwhat it is, to count the justice among bodily aptitude to resolve when maybeapplied by man a bandage or stitch.

Closing Statement;

The doctors are not counting in direct funding when it isdonations to a pink ribbon for cause or cure, such that they would not countthe means to necessary apply to a open wound possible to express imamatedanger, then the cloud should go to directly as well and help build aunderstanding of this for cancer patients may already.

Personal Topic:

Clericalcompetence for cost should the court appeal of the United States Copyright office hold reason both copyof and nether original seen, I pay for postage.

Opening Argument;

As par quote of the copyright office form printed from thegovernment website an individual, myself, followed instructions diligently andsent in for reason of government expression back up a original works materialon CD media with only the page or two of printed material of the form find fromthe website that the copyright contains 40 extra pages of printed material andit is at cost of 250$ for myself, the copyright holder to view that I should bereimbursed and the interception legitimacy of the postal service or copyrightoffice determination be up for review as to what interception meant to ones ownprecious material at choice of contend the reason to ones own use of the formand office.

Additional Addendum;

With out paying the ransom, there is speculation on mybehalf, of two documents on the media that have page numbers with in give ortake 10 page differences but neither is exact to the indication of how manyprinted pages were copyrighted along with the material CD. At the artifacts of the United States Postalservice and the impermeably time set face of a government website form acopyright for computer media was thoroughly examined for clerical competenceand then sent in via instruction that had new search index indication that hasneither been fulfilled either by the postal service intermediate interceptionor the blatant disrespect for ones mail service to the effect of the materialnow said by such index is at cost to the copyright holder to merely examinewhat was not mailed to the copyright office. To achieve respects for what thegovernment website, trusted to be true and time set to security of factualbased information evident to paper in conjunction or peoples lives, see to theindex search results for said copyrighted material that was neither printed normailed to the copyright office by myself, that now appears in copyright of digitalmedia along with, that which was per quo the instructions with the copyrightform likely but not with out examining, truthfully handed in at saiddisrespects of extra 40 or so printed pages that have found their way into thecopyright with no announcement to the holder, making the fee for learning whatis in the individuals name, a cold 250$ and the digital media at compromise tobeing really what is at sent in by either the postal mail interception or thecopyright office itself, to the knowledge of the holder, myself. At cost, the copyright form is sent in, as aprotection to have a representative party of the individuals governmentrespectfully first and foremost have the only or readily documented par quote ofthe individuals material, so the blatant disrespect to the option set forth mayonly reside on opinion of a failing technological department, par their ownstatement news posting stating their behind, of the Copyright Office as theyrequire something of print but have not indicated on the form to do so and/orreimburse all costs media, postage, and copyright for having what is preciousin decision to the form filler andnobody else may do so for them, shun their mass materials. Provide indication such as the printed formstates, that is the only printed material sent in of some 2 or less pieces ofpaper does not match the statement of 40+ printed pages included with thecopyright that is neither fair nor allowance of said reason for the work of theindividuals at the copyright office to commend, as the individual has notknowledge of what is copy of neither anyone explained other then the indexsearch at copyright.gov, as well, their support has been contacted and the sameindication has been made, ignored to the statement of paying a fee for 250$ isall they will officer the individual due for return of the record..

Closing Statement;

Reimbursed 0.65 CD Media, .49 a Stamp 0.04 a Envelope, 45$Ink, 239$ Epson Printer, 60$ Copyright Fee, 250$ Record View

Personal Topic:

Selfrepresentation is not affirmative action, consists of due process, threeexisting firm members, parting to join two libraries of one for formidable casework load and library in itself.

A selfrepresentative of legal stand is a member of the public and there fore violatedfirm law in usual day to day pro bono operation. Reduction of a single guilty D.W.I. andmultiple not guilty DUI

Evidence Overview;

Statistics and points of interest to gather for building thecases

Incidents

• Mall of America falsified dog suicide.
• Mystic Lake, Shakopee and Belmont.
• North Arm boat launch parking lot.
• Toms B.W.I. on Lake Minnetonka.
• Bailiff arraigns outside of court room.

Eight brown jurisdiction officers

• Shakopee incident troopers name.
• Shakopee incident cat or K9s name.
• Restitution incident D.N.R. name.
• 1st of two B.W.I. incident D.N.R. name.
• 2nd of two B.W.I. incident D.N.R. name.
• Mall of America incident troopers name.
• Mall of America incident K9s name.
• Bailiff outside courtroom at settlement.

Localized police department officers

• Shakopee incident local officers name.
• 1st of plethora Mall of America incident police.
• 2nd of plethora Mall of America incident police.
• Restitution incident local officers name.

Security guards in uniform

• 1st of plethora Mall of America incident guard.
• 2nd of plethora Mall of America incident guard.
• 3rd of plethora Mall of America incident guard.
• 1st of plethora Mystic Lake incident guard.
• 2nd of plethora Mystic Lake incident guard.
• 3rd of plethora Mystic Lake incident guard.

Personal Topic:

M.A.D.D.A.M,D.Panel (Minors against drunken driving accommodating mothers drunk)

Opening statement;

Friends dont let friends dive drunk off a boat to awardforked custody of minors and evade grand theft auto, they let the water patrolsee your B.W.I. and raise you a D.W.I. in the same getaway that death hasproven capable and funeral there of has provided incapable presumably walkingleast the attraction of VIN party involved resume impossible responsible planshelping the hand of a lady resuming raising U.S. of a minor grown to man.

Additional Addendum;

It is the efforts of this case and defense to providedecisions made intentionally with out travel innovated citing the conduct ofwater patrol for hazing and/or minors for misunderstanding the relevance of whatmust had occurred during one said day where Thomas Forystek Senior acquires aB.W.I. at the audit of city roads and not just property of the lake side, as towhich where as in come cases, not this being one, where a boat launch doesoccur a parking lot, this particular launch site, expressed, does not, norcontains public available docking in the year which maybe up to review todefine whether or not the water patrols decision does intact see said B.W.I.match, and raise a D.W.I. by allowance of minors put in charge of port andstarboard manning the throttle in need of halt reaction. In the case of this which the adult partiesare not in joint custody of each others children, the stipulations of the otheroption in grand theft auto are quite possibly undermined or over sighted toresponsible action needed taken by one or both of the adult parties to fatedcustody not theirs for the time period. It is not an opinion, but rather theliability of challenge all three minors legal custody to exclude possible thirdparty being the awarded factor, for resolve issued a fourth party logicallybeing involved when not present, nor property related to the incident, least achild whom rightfully would like to know someones improper baby sitting is nottheir divulged right, but their parents involved correction with the localauthorities on their own bewitched behalf of state representation. The deformation of characterization ofirresponsible parents gone unnoted then would like to should it come to thefork already planted in the road past of a divorce case challenging custody inabusing hearing would just mind I interject statement of preposterous medicaladvisory due to a cry that no one but myself has taken the time to understandover the years is how a doctor may feel the need to x-ray a injury that is notso visible externally and denounce the medical aspirations of said company whomhave had advantage over a diploma study of Advanced Biology after all, it was atelevision program of information that explained a animals cry and instinct ofthe parents to provide that helped me understand how a E.R room would havechanged the rest of my life in breathing, and unknown later pains that manifestin getting older as well likely cosmetically, had the bone fracture in my facebeen set with respects to a professional opinion of emergency. Before judgmentof a scientific blood related fact come to hand, please involve the bestphysicians partys opportunity to speak before reprimanded ignorance claimknown scientific fact of parent and legal appeal, of what may neither be truthas well.

Personal Topic:

One D.W.I. and allD.U.I upon my record reduced to one D.U.I. on account of character ofdeformation lien of federal officers driving.

Opening Argument:

The actions of federal D.N.R. officers placed in motionduring a B.W.I. become the course of two possible routes to option with nobetter scenario presented a choice was made that continues to defer a characterjudgment and officers good civic oath and duty with making the wrong decisionssuch as those I made by driving friends in what would be my only D.W.I. to dateas well as inopportunity directly placed on actions of poor authoritiesdecisions that may risk future safety of their performances.

Additional Addendum:

Going over the B.W.I. specifically in memory how it wentwhich enabled the decisions of D.N.R. officers that will effect three otherfederal decisions in authorities positions during their performance and projectjudgment on my behalf to wade the options in a state of inebriation, always afalse safety, but hindering change, giving prelude to multiple D.U.I. that forinstance are not misinterpreted but are infect side effect false for thefindings at each driving violation.

Going over each of the three other cases, where a officialof brown jurisdiction became involved, also retained bad judgment and/or ismissing from the record, pertaining as well, to two K9 officers, whom by inbestow pass, largely instinct the passive actions of the job as all communicationnot just a false or true query to the entire picture like that a human may findhimself error on action to the best safety performance of everyones abilitiesto cooperation.

Going over the D.U.I. and similarities to passive nature ofquestionable slide scale safety first as a constant reminder that the linewalked liens to one direction if certain said influence was or was not aprojection normality more features then a irrational judgment for somethinglike energy or pain that consistently effects, and the ladder, a high feelingthat is physiological that may cloud judgment

Going over due to the actual fate in play set forth by theB.W.I. and what decision had the double driving effect been the wrong of avariant few ways the situation could be handled, how this effects the directconsole of ones self in a inebriated or non, such as authorities performingduty, decision making spite the better option for both parties involved in asituation of care taking before officers arrive, and care taking as the officersassess arrests and evidence to the initial charge.

Going over the facts the officers may well had known theinjunction they are using is not the best viable option to their conscious andnoted by their lack of reporting where as missing facts present not in therecords so far as I am able to query, which is a sign of their escape thesituation they may know is not wrong but not finding the right solution totheir continue, thus willingly, under character deformation leave out portionsrelevant to the case, such as a initial stopping troopers name or involvementall together, for a pull over that is passed to local authorities.

Going over for good reasons what the K9 units have held upas their duty in performance of last options to spot check the officer in courtfor the case, least responsible probability that the humans on the cases havedone said single time duty per case, and really get what is allowed for theirsigning oath, obtained in cherish out values with their rewarding sensibilityto by so loyal with out these distress calls.

Closing Statement:

It is with out a doubt that the facts and cases have beenrevisited and sets in motion proper revocation of initial findings for thebetter of each party involved such that the court and police as well as citizengoverning systems have justified the conclusion of this said case, providingproof evident the fact not opinion of deformation in character judgment onNicholass entire D.U.I. and D.W.I. record that which have been set straightwith the providing reduction to concerns well kept and that future involvementupon the road of this wake are properly adjusted in first time patterns and nottaking up time and mental health of individuals involved.

Personal Topic:

Given factsexhibited in hypothesis form in-between open and closing sentences during acase, the following is a case argument for obstruction to a wall as unjust tobe listened with out concern for discernment a must:

Opening Argument:

Hearing through walls or any other solid object may not beheard in origin context.

Hypothesis Theories:

1. A wall is solid

       Experiment:With a solid, such as a rock, attempt to move your hand through it,record finds.

       Control: With a non solid, such as water,attempt to move your hand through it, record finds.

       Test:With a wall, attempt to move your hand through it, record comparisonfindings.

2. Sound waves travel

       Experiment: Half way between Point A and C,clock a cap gun bang sound at point A for how long it takes the sound to reachpoint C.

       Control: On point A, clock a cap gun bang atpoint A for how long it takes to hear the sound at point A.

       Test: Clock a cap gun bang sound at point A forhow long it takes the sound to reach point C.

3. Solid objects dampen sound

       Experiment:Sound a cap gun near a solid object with hollow interior, and microphoneon the exterior opposing side of the cap gun.Record volume findings.

       Control:Sound a cap gun near a solid object with a hollow interior andmicrophone on the interior. Recordvolume findings.

       Test:Sound a cap gun with out a solid object and microphones where the solidobject was when were in interior and exterior placements. Record volume findings.

4. Sound collides with solid objects

       Experiment:Sound a cap gun off in an interior small room and microphone inside aswell and record the findings of reverb echo.

       Control: Sound a cap gun off outside of any roomin wide open spaces and microphone record the findings of reverb echo.

       Test: Sound a cap gun off in an interior smallroom with a hanging tinfoil sheet next to the gun and microphone record anyreverb echo of room and tin.

5. Ears hear sound

       Experiment:Record for one straight minute and during the minute has someone cap gunbehind you with a comment express when you hear it, record findings.

       Control:Record for one straight minute and during have no sound of a cap gun,behind you but raise no at the end of the minute if non-heard.

       Test:Record for one straight minute and during that minute has someone capgun behind you more then once and comment yes whenever you hear the gun, recordfindings.

6. Two sounds maybe only one

       Experiment: Drop a metal can to hit the floorand record the sound that it makes, and then record the findings.

       Control:Drop a plastic cup to hit the floor and record the sound that it makes,and then record the findings.

       Test:Drop a plastic cup and metal can to hit the floor at the same time andrecord the sound, recording the findings.

Hypothesis Facts

• In space sound bounces around off solid objects in plenty directions that change course which modifies travel over time in which an ear hears
• Travel over time in collision makes division that makes new sounds through adding the deflection itself to the ear by latency arrival may two.

Closing Statement:

Walls most certainly cause obstruction to sound waves thatmay bounce and combine two make one at the point of hearing in which wordscombine and English it self may discern, thus unable in context to be clearlyunderstood.

Personal Topic:

Level of attentionto projected under craft with battery vehicle.

Opening Statement:

Intended to provide a basic overview of speech 101 lessonsas told to me to credit the achievement of attention.

Additional Addendum:

In speech a very basic lesson is that of ways to grabsomeones attention, indefinite to know you have or have not, and ways toimprove attention getting. Singularlygetting one persons attention is a critical first step in component to seekingthe crowds attention. Knowing you haveones attention includes the direction they are facing, to or fro and also eyecontact, which one may have with you but their mind maybe still wandering notin attention. When you have directvisual reference they are facing you, a similarities to the importance ofspeech with in communication that also hold true in dire needs of calling forhelp is that possibility they are not still in attention. Using your visual ability and audio abilitymay still be needed, stuff like flailing your arms profusely would if a cry forhelp meant life or death, yelling of course, and using the word help, asimilarity to a start of a speech gathering the crowd to quiet may need someloud gestures for restlessness unsettled.Audio response is also attractive in calling for help, but not so muchin speech, as all silent is the audio help to deliver a clear uninterruptedmonologue. So in calling for help onedoes not respond we keep trying until we get that response in return. Sometimes in speech the crowd tends to getboard, and eyes begin to wander again.These are all indicators that the speech is not so thoroughly delivered,reinstruction of quiet or attention may be required considering the speechmaybe critical importance when the president is speaking, or relief effortslocally need organization. Illustrating this there is the negative to attentiongetting which is inversely as effective in drawing the response but not keepingthe attention. Tactics of this meansconsists of stopping what youre doing to get attention when the attentionturns to. Using a very low voice thatdoes not make it concisely hearing thus the turn to attention is also neededwhere as, sometimes direct the attention is not the same true they may alsohear while directed not at the speaker.Being out of range visually so that when attention arrives you furtherback out to hidden easily is the visual equivalent, to the low volume audioattention to halt. When you visuallyplace people in scenery they may disappear easily from obstruction, variousways like a car may use gas speed to do so the same, or just the door closing,but is as not human itself to hear. Atthese negative types of visual and audio reference to attention getting, thereis the human response of which a scenery or car is not capable of thus leavinghollow remnants bestowed upon. Quitepossibly, a kinder tide of mental illness of hearing voices that repeat forsimply bouncing off in defection. Nonethe less, a entire day span of this in constants as if it were which wasappointed in a health purpose negatively adverse on the tale, thesolidification of a repeated attempt to see or get attention response goes without and then it is continued when truly not found and emotion drives the soughtout. Humans in emotion tend to stay in emotion.Someone missing another person and nowhere to be found does not give uphope so easily. Someone with solidcomponent mental illness retardation may be physically missing their ability toreason check every visual non condoning possibility. Someone evading as if was loss not, yet stillnot with another in unjust goodbye, may cause a lot of damage unnecessarily andby no fault of their own.

Closing Argument:

There is not enough supporting evidence to consider therequesting party was properly addressing the respondent.

Personal Topic:

Identity Theft ofthe Most Try

Opening Argument:

Aim to clearly outline ways identity theft by trait of vetsis far more harsh and able when and should be taken literal is definite use.

Additional Addendum:

A parent has a right to sign for his children so long as theyare minor of age. A parent also has theright to deny or allow his children into opportunity of what could be earlyownership assets such as child acting does by the child gaining an income. The relative of any family member is an inhouse opportunity that minors are not able avoid in close quarters, and neithera parent raising their children. Aparent names neither their children, not an ill literal unable to walk norcognitive reasoning mentally yet developed in memory. When is it that with the advent of the Juniorand Senior suffix to names is going to be added to the Minnesota Name changeform which only includes three parts of a name, where as the technical Juniorand Senior in fact in case in hand represents a fourth at expense of three partsof a name, being the first, middle and last as exactly the same, then and onlythen is the Junior and Senior relevant.When a parent names their child and uses the Junior and Senior it may ormay not be intent that they are the same name on paper at any given time oftheir life, or belated to be a interchangeable posture to use of services oneor the either has enlisted with the name, but in case in hand, by ways ofnaming conventionally of the children there is far more then one sign of thislikely intent manifesting even so if did not, and whether expressed right awayor late, the proverb of the naming of the child in the beginning is at fault toidentity theft. In Nicholas familythere is Thomas John Forystek Junior his brother and Senior, his father and aswell a cousin of his Nicole K. Forystek which non similar to Nicholas R.Forystek if could suffix, yet is slightly similar to Nicole M. Forystek adeceased of his mothers first pregnancy whom was aborted in a controversial3rd trimester procedure at 11months old.It is likely hoof of the naming ability of Thomas John Forystek and MaryK. Forystek that Thomas John Forystek is in for identity theft he can notinstant manage the escape of, just as his father, would they both, par one setsit up, the other the use of, an account named Nich0ls. While Nicholas did express the word forusername he added a zero not to be cool but pass on what he did not believe hisbrother would do, which he then asked him to not make one, because he wouldntuse it, is when his brother proceeded to give it to his father for use. A man who by his own childs name, quitelikely planed to would do such perverse tactics in identity theft. As blood related, there is not need toexpress asset least the child know about it and it is in the development of,where as a care taking foster situation one that child abuse warrants prison,there is a reason to trick the child into thinking your blood related such thatyou do not have to explain their accompanied assets, such as the money stolenfrom Nicholas and the guilty party of use in his name, just as the man wouldname his son himself as himself after himself, and to be continued as identitytheft for expression of dealt.

Closing Statement:

The mans father figure, a close member of his growing up,outright has no conscious or sorry for the use of others names in overwritinguniqueness by reason of naming them himself with exhibited use undeniable.

Personal Topic:

Environmentalcleanup uniquely for the first time will occur with a class of attraction whengone on unknown; in two party biases their time better well spent not theenvironment timing defense.

Open Statement:

When unknown factors occur that can be harmful to community,humans or the environment itself as a quality of life plant or otherwiselivable probabilities, a clean up effort may be going on prior to actualmaintaining clean up of the larger issue.

Additional Addendum:

Large or small, everything is a learning experience and weare not always right, sometimes making effort in irreversible non permanentsolutions to the best of our ability.Efforts unfinished include two that are not known by each other where asone finalized another in a better permanent solution. Efforts are man made and only human, they donot include environments state of truly happening with or with out our guidanceresults in pursuant of when the calamity is disastrous or otherwise detrimentalto our health as a union. Before asequential likely hood of another solution, not readily available isactualized, an emergency act is in motion when we cite the effects it hasharming our health. These solutions liner like a case management in court, havepeople in the parallel attempting to react in urgency where needed, and thinkin long term for emergency that is with out reversible change. Thus the component of non resolve or lessthen capable full resolve has a lasting effect until light maybe shed and thatis only as depth as responsibility where we may never have non for non issuesconfined to out grasp of knowledge, also rather such profound reasoning andwould be conclusive solutions that they are laterally unattained by;individuals who have by in numbers agreed upon their reasoning a solutionwhether or not it is little to large help, still non resolve, and parties whobelieve that while unknown not a spoken token by the other party, still no signof relief continues their personal experience to distrust falsifiedresolve. Providing two parallel realitieson a liner gauge, a offsetting as such maybe religiously sought in support, orcriminally foreign in attack, ladder effect is ignorant unknown to logicalarrogance bestow. A eventual event mayhappen with only the parallel experience and not he environment that which isacceptance, with out grievance for the venture of urgency having a effect, ofthat which is also denial to distain sought out resolve in whether god or man,a environment distrust that community wont let down their fight for regaininggrounds of a happier health to all and then to such goes the spoils. These spoils may never arise resulting of anallocation of what it is in extreme environment issues or very little everydaythings we dont do for ourselves, the reason to which party you may be on theside of in same time frame of environment occurrence. A third logical external to the detrimentaleffects as a party also is liaison to either of these formidable partiesresponses to the quality of environment of which, may enter the refute andchoose their side, well in fact, not so true for the first of unknown healthmay prosper well more, with a solution to the a sure thing, graces.

Closing Argument;

Either of these two parties cites an example of the cause,and has an opinionated bias to their actions over the time of an environmentalhealth hindering hindsight their actions foregoing the option in the same.

Personal Topic:

Child support caseof the business kind in a draw out judgment of courts appealing decision wellincludes council confined in preface case if opinion.

Opening Statement:

Contempt of court holds up tilt of cases when in pinballapparent the pusher waiver of wins so while outside the mends you need see thejudge, not a third party to fuzz detectors of humans preaching their childprotectors.

Additional Addendum:

Go over major prospects of ways court is foreigndiplomatically under fire in a war, for establishing none use with in its ownsystem. Holding up court as not regular sick or holiday paid vacationssimilarly characterizes a all left or all right standard starting first inhistory to resolve of reach the pinnacle combats new case entry by relate tocase agenda at hand. In two partysupport of playing with themselves, excuse the expression, the condemn it thesame for ways dates and individuals must be placed in harmony. Go over no fight is rightfully allowed incourt, plenty of sue is just that when involved two parties as individual nonbusiness defined inanimate objects of a influence, such as the environment,sometimes bites, seemingly a fight but one for all, all afford when may casemanagement uncover interest in revisiting with out reason of reproach. Two parties in a dispute such as that in sueone another is a technical fight and while with words appreciating the courtsappeal, like behaved adults, it is still neither a will enough to peak ajudges topic response decision on case priority for not lasting what maybeplaying with themselves and/or hold up built tilts. Tilts like in pinball are only capable of byforce from what the ball touches, thus the parent object to the ball, capableof continued tilt, when with a lobbyist in part together nor neither to dowhether or not holds out by off, the ball then has no control in single player,two person pinball playing push the machine toggling the ball at unrest orcapable itself reach the decision to play at all. These are technical non use of the courtswith the court resources and a Judge sitting center stage does not capable havenot already entered in standing position to court itself, and likely oninvasion by silent enemy, this is probable easy waivers for foreign attacks onU.S.A. soil, as well, preprocessed standard ignorant of unaware to their causemay deemed better, come and go type of repeat case daily habit.

Closing Argument:

There is a definite out of play indicator by the judge,and therefore placing the opening statements at peril to the factor of theentry requirements that such in business it is considered late child supportpayments only resolved by representative backing out of the case to concludetheir dissolving of for selfish purpose that neither the judge apprehends fornor the pretends poor the perquisite payments when once before cases as suchwere closed, the judge importantly pertains to business and the adult able presenta statement, arraigns with out retainer, case in hand, pointing no right evenwhen just words to ask a judge to finish their fight against the youth whomwith they known control is the courts too appealing.

Personal Topic:

Some peoples timebetter spent in their own allocation must not be reasonably those of disasterefforts cleaning up, or neither profit of a natural disaster in effort onestime.

Opening Statement:

During events of disasters whether unknown or seen, thoseefforts of the kind cherish well before the proposed determination of timeallotted the same for all individuals who place will in their purposing.

Additional Addendum:

Priority of natural disasters may not be known or advancedof human health may always see more in areas not predestine but human increation. When there is a potential offbalance those too may also not me known by most but certainly some symptoms ofmental illnesses illustrate when a person or people become in need of help. The signs alone may be the help for theguidance where as someone doesnt ignore the initial but not potential raisedcommunity problem someone could be exhibiting.This like habit can go on in nature but there is also posture of whohelps who in emerges a priority.Possibilities that involvement are ones aspiration of time are to be setaside for anothers, and likely that someone is a hospital respondent oremergency respondent like the police or firemen, are both time consuming andmost likely a choice whether demand or bothered to enforced. When we speak of the environment a similarityto a chemical spill, verses a company dumping, or an already chemical company,this maybe going on with little or potential large risks for long run that isnot immediate in operation knowledge of the future of. Consider the incident it is, and considerthree parties of action, and three parties outside action whom have voice. One party is the company, another two are thepublic, one is ignoring with out listen, and another is concerned. One company may become concerned should theconcern approach, but one thing for certain of the problem being at problem tothe future is that the outcome is benefits to health whether mental orphysical. Should the company not becomeon board and concern still continues, the ignoring maybe made aware and joinhelp efforts of petitions, abiding to three other non exhibiting parties arethe same parties at all these types of health risk events that maybe not seenor will be eventually those in history like a oil spill in the cleanup effortstage. To propose others whom ultimately didnt have involvement one way oranother is not happening at events unknown in what may better the environmentstill just ideas uncreated. To be concernedand not the company is possibly the ill fated reign check of what was paymentto the invalid party they would rather had heard. What is neither of these are the mentalissues of those who take effort to gain on the events using the damage of thedown fall in light of the reaction not changing or really efforts of a foreignoutbreak of war in anothers country. Somuch so that it becomes the child support case for selfish payments unvalued inefforts maybe neutral to non existent before they are head on damaging withproviding no the information of enlighten rather just chalking it up tounexplained,, with out haste, later in historical is just a boat spilled, thosewho had their effort to provide no change watching along maybe not the bestmetal status of child support in extremity and therefore proprietors of mentaldisorders. Illness aside, disorderremains no orderly, unless maybe corrected but environment posing a challengehas no time for let another make the challenge harder for speaking unknowndepths of the solution or know what is happening being a way t know how the fixcomes about.

Closing Argument:

There is capitalizing however so be fit the time of an actfor bipartisan parties for to be with in their own respect supporting their ownchildren neighbor or environment otherwise that does not reflect all will ofothers over a same time period, more then one party may have spoken for theirpiece forever held in non help the ordering of mental abilities over their lifein crutch of environmental abusive, ignorance, strategy or war.

Personal Topic:

Ensure of issuesreused insurance instance of case definition as seconds neither commits personscontinue with said names portrayal in predisposition carry propone know willdefined nuisance firm.

Opening Argument:

Then it is with out grace that I declare my will be assumemy name with in a case of any due process has process before thrown out,affords fort, and with out a doubt as adult, arraign or summons on width outdetainee nor bench warrant, the ability when and if case opening for interestendurances, council then presents as two more parties of public kept asdiscreet as transcripts to conclude a firm basis of said propone knowallowances library becomes two by in defined interest handled fiscal incumbentto reason of cases made interest the individual.

Additional Addendum:

To appropriate funding of monetary cash note value misspenton what the interest of the issue has means for, the case must be made for theentire time results of needs met while the providing funding is set apartindifferent from able use for any funding, but never spend with any fundingfor. To show up providing two or morecases in chain by named individual as receipted, the health of the courts haveby in operation concluded a propone know for raster knowledge there of and notsaid inclusion, happens to be width out doubt a intrusion of securitiesprospected by the courts own contempt with including the public or definingpropone know at the risk of including real situations, there in a clause ofwar, allowed respectable business may thus in private courtship, has a error ofdoubt to the validity of one or more cases continuum, also suffered one moreexpense at any given time, with out charge or arrest, maintained on soil ofUnited States courtship contended by none interaction well with or whethertricked, where in might due process be trove.

Closing Statement:

To set apart money providing proof needs of a unit togetherbest just reasons other then said court interest in appeal the issue of ensure,unit or otherwise does not captivate nor include by advance real name allowancefrom case to case more for lack of unofficially delivering a providing featureof court case itself, sequentially has a propone know effect when the councilallows continuance.

Personal Topic:

Child support tobe paid by cases where corporations become the financial backing projectproceedings occurring with out the neither further defined representatives norcourt appealing mental illness.

Opening Argument;

Those cases in hand of corporations that must back out butare given case management by the judge before doing so and defined to return orneither accept there in what is being neglected is a child support on adulthood of their own post contestant to the return in reference have not also theillustration of reasonably mentally ill capacity as defined by in time oflengthily drawn out open cases that do not cease to occur with out respectingthe terminology of child support is contingent on the subject representatives.

Additional Addendum:

In order to lead to an arrest one must had presented thearrest where in by there fore the arriving party requesting was lead to suchwhether citizen or local police department, the police must finalize thearrest. Arresting parties and or selflessacts to do so and by way in which query the FBIs program of funding awarded toany information leading to an arrest then by in most part is department fundingthat likely cycles amongst themselves.However in the selfless event at which someone maybe named on the listthemselves and decided to turn themselves in they for when which what one holdsgoing in to jail, becomes what they are holding coming out. This is not the case with prison. Jail is about a population controlling forceand time out, while prison is about a career continuance respect and timein. It is with reason you must loosesomething in prison, while in jail you may have artifacts not larger thenusually what is on your person, this can include a deceased love one in an urnof a small necklace of ash. Therefore,providing child support on the way out, handed back your artifacts. Thus say acareer wanted individual posted as reward for information leading to an arresthas a change of heart and decided he will be turning himself in, before he goeshe allows himself time to tie up loose ends and provide support for a long termto his children perhaps, or even elder mother whom he hopes will be remainingsupporting of his children when he gets out and everything resumes the way itwere, then is false accredited a commentary on rights to population controlthat which is stronger then and neither career, the suffering respects of jobsand tasks that we perform on the day to day, a reason jail is dedicatedspecifically apart from prisons in their difference. In jail unless dire, or doing life, you donot get medical help and dental attention as well. Absent of population and by a non open keypolicy, these things are required to be of life supported first and foremostbefore arriving that you should be healthy enough to sustain yoursentence. Then as so much, a parent or aspouse may do on absolutely belittled to a object, such as a urn with ash or adiamond ring, these artifacts are remaining property in a perfect world without clerical error or corrupt P.D. theft, that as objects are not really ablesupport children nor themselves. So aselfless act of entry fond of a exit goes with out reason that even when pocketcash is allowance to jail and/or received when you exit, the selfless man thenshall not be overseer or two parties parent to the jail, receiving rewardedmoney, even if going to the police, by his action of entry even in unannouncedto receiving, is at fault of the child supporting adulthood of a terminalpotential flaw in the system where as awarded money in custody, shouldformidably be the guardian company of actual children and not indirectlythrough police funding a continuing cycle of award money challenged.

Closing Statement:

By truth and not unaccredited discernment the funding poolpardons level of incriminated intent of children and adults for police fundingand there fore should be taken as literal by courts when in which a jailerspocket is purposed to awarded funding with out sacrificing the cost ofcommunity childhood development for police department substitution.

Personal Topic:

Child supportcases on adult hood are that of taste and not mental disorders for which by wayward.

Opening Statement;

The bi-partisan projection of will of ways lets the absenteeof support to back out and reenter concluded of case course when while mentaldisorders are prophetic only to their cause and not by entrapment, black mail,nor concluded allowance to care for in certain second party for which waveswill not justify the end of the environment needs therefore concludes a mentaldisorder in un-orderly adjustment of their supportive child selfishly..

Additional Addendum;

Hypothesis needs to be drawn out for chemicals lighter thenair being that of the length of time of god and the human ear of lie, thatwhere way which is not waste exit providing when has run its cell bodycourse. Two chemicals need be cited forproceeding parties to contend of case for cold war projection in position beinga civil dispute matter, and whether war not when the fruits of the loins of manis lighter then air as well in all movements human thy kingdom come to bearrived at this juncture with or with out God, the sciences of life, and publicaffairs in foreign admission. Cite twochemicals, less dense then air by way of hypothesis fact based provision, and ahypothesis to recreation of controlled test to provide proof semen as well andthe human nature is least weighted among as.

Closing Argument;

The H-Bomb of the cold war still in effect attacking ourcivil selves is by no way in direction come for a mental school of the patheticself loathing win or less in a environmental adult support disastrous then byway mental disorderly displaced the children in your representational halts forproceeding with out due process catches up.

III: Case Flowchart

The statue for kidnapping andmurder is not ever, because it may go unappreciated, one example of this ismissing persons. Least a murder or akidnapping you may still not appreciate a missing person as missing, but thatmay be how the ever takes to hold. Yetwhen the mention of life in the statue is said, it does not have a time framelike that of the sentence. The reason isa double life sentence in the sentencing and how it comes to be and what it meansin accordance to what needs to be up held in responding riot controls whetherE.M.S. or concerned citizens. A doublelife sentence is given when the vague duality of negativity is seen after deathin a murder upon ground effects whether the negativity of the individualsconcerned in spit or the proposal of the murders tandem to their life inbalance forced in sight verses the casual accidental death, all be it still sadit does not desiccate the grave head stone of the deceased for E.M.S. to see itrightfully wrong, where it does, a negativity is empowered and thereforewhether police or people, a second responder whether police or benefit of thedoubt, riot control for the type of negativity that is mass murder, is at fatechallenged with a murder inspiring negativity in casting any responder asmurder, is not a death or kill in determination of sentencing. So sure be it a murder, with the negativity,a first responder is poised to demise what is firm in statue meaning likepeople standing forever never touching each other, in fashion, yet incapitalism it signifies a perfect being at met challenged and there fore, atcost of life in the statue not of a set time, for kidnapping and murder, reasonof persons involved another persons free will, threatens what the police wouldfind as a situation before arriving needing of riot control such as massmurders and or condemned negativity with then shows for expulsion is notrightfully accidental and in for more infrastructure against ones selfvicariously was the first act, and a second responder must retain as riotcontrol for municipal statue, whether citizen in concerned helping of trainedprofessional responder. To conceal amurder or kidnapping is to already challenge the first responder as being in ariot, three or more people, then thus advances at reported to if and when itescalates to answers, rather then what would be someone proposing to statutepersonal that evading the truth is negativity imposition to their vitality inrisky situation jobs such as police, or medical. Therefore the negativityalready ensues and thus may result in double life sentencing depending on howhorrific the reference of action occurs, or humbling it doesnt go so bad ascontinue to go for more, which references the fact, you may be sentences withtwo double life sentences, or any count for that matter, where as the double isnot pertaining to in count, but in act of foreboding ones life, and how so howreap managed the sentencing. A doublelife sentence does not give a time allotted offering. Where as a life sentence has a maximum of 45years, so two life sentences to be served consecutive is 85 years, and it hasbeen seen from anywhere to roughly 25 years to that 45 is what is possible inbehavioral truth, average is 35 years for served out life sentences, when ongood behavior. Hopes walking in arepartial to that good behavior, a double life sentenced person is probably infar more restrains and completely uncooperative to the panel of a whole year instraight jacket and means of belittled fed and bathed are must for safety ofthe guards. More then one double lifesentencing can be brought about from obedient types of acts that offend varioussects over the normality of just local authorities and make for funded resultsin public relations part of clean up, for instance, another countriesauthority, or even another, to go for three countries authorities risk managedby the life statue to make it triple double sentencing.

Nicholas Forystek verses the Department of Natural Resourcesfor 2 counts of authority misconduct disposition of the loss of their duty asauthority through promotion, and 3 counts of reckless driving to restore it inrecognizing what transpired on two separate occasions, one neither my case andas a minor, warranted for put in charge of overseeing an adult makes it home,one count of driving and not two of which happen on the road as well as thewater. The wake of which likely shouldhad been a stolen property case to take the benefit of doubt, arrives a secondreference contact with the D.N.R. where the situation was not secured with thereckless driver, the passenger, and from the passenger seat, allowed to remainsitting in, while I was seen not in the car, the car being the reason forpulled over, however in my name, in cooperation and reason for pulling over,closing a trunk I was asked to open it before the reckless driver wassecured. In both cases all the peopleinvolved have become problematic contacts in continued relationships with if atall at cost of a warning past of misconduct appropriate.