I: Definition of Terms

• Personal Topic A quick topic title for the following outline case that is neither name nor non explanatory and for authorship memory in clearly outline needed points there of.
• Opening Statement A single sentence that is the non argument statement presented to the case in initial and first words, for judgmental query in strict allowance to close with argument.
• Opening Argument A single sentence that is the neither statement presented to the case in initial and first words, for judgmental query in strict allowance to close with a statement.
• Additional Addendum Any in between notes and directive the case party needs to outline or make the case after opening and before closing with in reason to directives shown.
• Evidence Overview All pertaining matters to the case of taxable retroactive transgression that maybe required per quo cited during a notable case consideration of occurrences.
• Hypothesis Holdings Any actual scientific hypothesis preformed before the case ensues that may/will be presented as fact basis to the building of reason to directives shown.
• Closing Statement A single sentence that is the non argument statement lasting remark upon the closing of the case at judgmental happening case derivatives or audited triumph.
• Closing Argument A single sentence that is the neither statement derived out of a case success in direction to appoint probable positions of closing triumphantly opens new cases.
• Case Number A sequential or unique (and related uniquely) identifying word consisting of numerical and/or alphabet that is only significant to cases in scope of this organized document.
• Case Listing The bulk information of this document that overviews the parts to each case needed in involvement and contains the majority help for benefactor during open to close.
• Case Flowchart The cohesive construct of case to case in co-existing collective that presents each case from one to all in connection as a whole to achieve each and all case in cross filing.

II: Case Listing

Personal Topic:

Family unitstogether have the right to the privacy of quarters to be supportive but nolonger a second grant to those in the community least adoctor should be able to extend.

Opening Argument;

Some in their decisions of supporting projection in familyunits also portray a public projection and to be thankful for what is not theirjob they should take heed to whom is neither their allowance, recognizing, themental health portion of the in for reference.

Additional Addendum;

Just in a family or neighborhood alike is the standingreason for age limit of minor and adult, with expectations, but neither beingwith community to allotted natural disaster relief when one would choose to besocial rather then express their not at the situation maybe helps themselvesout more then their required responsibility under house and hold however doesnot extend their decisions with the community to projection above and beyondthe a lot time necessary they maybe a cause of and separation becomesperquisite to help and health whether individual or natural disaster. Those in a natural disaster are the wreakedin relief to what is occurring and those around outside the natural disasterimmediate in surroundings are the strong in relief to were not in and may handhelp like many do when the clear is safe.Those who choose to remain in the disaster are not greater a reliefblind of victimized, and thus the community need to those who choose their willto just help and those whom maybe make career, none the less when misunderstoodis shadowed by disaster.

Closing Argument;

Adult child support cases are much like mental health issuesto the community for the fact they go hand and hand with due process incompleteto be tracking where best fits the standing court appearance that can not be achild alone, neither the mental health issued stance if not the individualsthemselves.

Personal Topic:

The immunity ofman in the cloud may not count for my defenses.

Opening Argument;

Cancer donations are for the cause of cancer, in somestatements and for the cure of cancer in another, by their statement, the moneyis not going to learn the cause to fight the cure but rather when not placeddirectly in funding these two are appropriate avocations in a lesson wellsomeone elses such that the immunity shall not count in defense, as it wouldbe a weakness.

Additional Addendum;

Explanation of the broad ranged generalization of immunityover running with up to speed everyones basic understanding of cancer, as itis not rightfully printed on death certificates. Then an overview of how it may relate to abandage use similar in counting, where as no matter the amount of ailment, theimmunity does not count then nor should a doctor or relate to a patient theirmeans by in which shared immunity such as the cloud as a metaphorical pancreasfights absent of the count, always working toward resolve, not always found forinstance of infection with bandaging.That such to be healthily understanding the immunity short comings in ainstance of infection kept a wound open and a bandage means not resolve untilthe infection is, then by in which way we waiver cancer with out a factor ofwhat it is, to count the justice among bodily aptitude to resolve when maybeapplied by man a bandage or stitch.

Closing Statement;

The doctors are not counting in direct funding when it isdonations to a pink ribbon for cause or cure, such that they would not countthe means to necessary apply to a open wound possible to express imamate danger,then the cloud should go to directly as well and help build a understanding ofthis for cancer patients may already.

Personal Topic:

Clericalcompetence for cost should the court appeal of the United States Copyright office hold reason both copyof and nether original seen, I pay for postage.

Opening Argument;

As par quote of the copyright office form printed from thegovernment website an individual, myself, followed instructions diligently andsent in for reason of government expression back up a original works materialon CD media with only the page or two of printed material of the form find fromthe website that the copyright contains 40 extra pages of printed material andit is at cost of 250$ for myself, the copyright holder to view that I should bereimbursed and the interception legitimacy of the postal service or copyrightoffice determination be up for review as to what interception meant to ones ownprecious material at choice of contend the reason to ones own use of the formand office.

Additional Addendum;

With out paying the ransom, there is speculation on mybehalf, of two documents on the media that have page numbers with in give ortake 10 page differences but neither is exact to the indication of how manyprinted pages were copyrighted along with the material CD. At the artifacts of the United States Postalservice and the impermeably time set face of a government website form acopyright for computer media was thoroughly examined for clerical competenceand then sent in via instruction that had new search index indication that hasneither been fulfilled either by the postal service intermediate interceptionor the blatant disrespect for ones mail service to the effect of the materialnow said by such index is at cost to the copyright holder to merely examinewhat was not mailed to the copyright office. To achieve respects for what thegovernment website, trusted to be true and time set to security of factualbased information evident to paper in conjunction or peoples lives, see to theindex search results for said copyrighted material that was neither printed normailed to the copyright office by myself, that now appears in copyright ofdigital media along with, that which was per quo the instructions with thecopyright form likely but not with out examining, truthfully handed in at saiddisrespects of extra 40 or so printed pages that have found their way into thecopyright with no announcement to the holder, making the fee for learning whatis in the individuals name, a cold 250$ and the digital media at compromise tobeing really what is at sent in by either the postal mail interception or thecopyright office itself, to the knowledge of the holder, myself. At cost, the copyright form is sent in, as aprotection to have a representative party of the individuals governmentrespectfully first and foremost have the only or readily documented par quoteof the individuals material, so the blatant disrespect to the option set forthmay only reside on opinion of a failing technological department, par their ownstatement news posting stating their behind, of the Copyright Office as theyrequire something of print but have not indicated on the form to do so and/orreimburse all costs media, postage, and copyright for having what is precious indecision to the form filler and nobodyelse may do so for them, shun their mass materials. Provide indication such as the printed formstates, that is the only printed material sent in of some 2 or less pieces ofpaper does not match the statement of 40+ printed pages included with thecopyright that is neither fair nor allowance of said reason for the work of theindividuals at the copyright office to commend, as the individual has notknowledge of what is copy of neither anyone explained other then the indexsearch at copyright.gov, as well, their support has been contacted and the sameindication has been made, ignored to the statement of paying a fee for 250$ isall they will officer the individual due for return of the record..

Closing Statement;

Reimbursed 0.65 CD Media, .49 a Stamp 0.04 a Envelope, 45$Ink, 239$ Epson Printer, 60$ Copyright Fee, 250$ Record View

Personal Topic:

Selfrepresentation is not affirmative action, consists of due process, threeexisting firm members, parting to join two libraries of one for formidable casework load and library in itself.

A selfrepresentative of legal stand is a member of the public and there fore violatedfirm law in usual day to day pro bono operation. Reduction of a single guilty D.W.I. and multiplenot guilty DUI

Evidence Overview;

Statistics and points of interest to gather for building thecases

Incidents

• Mall of America falsified dog suicide.
• Mystic Lake, Shakopee and Belmont.
• North Arm boat launch parking lot.
• Toms B.W.I. on Lake Minnetonka.
• Bailiff arraigns outside of court room.

Eight brown jurisdiction officers

• Shakopee incident troopers name.
• Shakopee incident cat or K9s name.
• Restitution incident D.N.R. name.
• 1st of two B.W.I. incident D.N.R. name.
• 2nd of two B.W.I. incident D.N.R. name.
• Mall of America incident troopers name.
• Mall of America incident K9s name.
• Bailiff outside courtroom at settlement.

Localized police department officers

• Shakopee incident local officers name.
• 1st of plethora Mall of America incident police.
• 2nd of plethora Mall of America incident police.
• Restitution incident local officers name.

Security guards in uniform

• 1st of plethora Mall of America incident guard.
• 2nd of plethora Mall of America incident guard.
• 3rd of plethora Mall of America incident guard.
• 1st of plethora Mystic Lake incident guard.
• 2nd of plethora Mystic Lake incident guard.
• 3rd of plethora Mystic Lake incident guard.

Personal Topic:

M.A.D.D.A.M,D.Panel (Minors against drunken driving accommodating mothers drunk)

Opening statement;

Friends dont let friends dive drunk off a boat to awardforked custody of minors and evade grand theft auto, they let the water patrolsee your B.W.I. and raise you a D.W.I. in the same getaway that death hasproven capable and funeral there of has provided incapable presumably walkingleast the attraction of VIN party involved resume impossible responsible planshelping the hand of a lady resuming raising U.S. of a minor grown to man.

Additional Addendum;

It is the efforts of this case and defense to providedecisions made intentionally with out travel innovated citing the conduct ofwater patrol for hazing and/or minors for misunderstanding the relevance ofwhat must had occurred during one said day where Thomas Forystek Senioracquires a B.W.I. at the audit of city roads and not just property of the lakeside, as to which where as in come cases, not this being one, where a boatlaunch does occur a parking lot, this particular launch site, expressed, doesnot, nor contains public available docking in the year which maybe up to reviewto define whether or not the water patrols decision does intact see said B.W.I.match, and raise a D.W.I. by allowance of minors put in charge of port andstarboard manning the throttle in need of halt reaction. In the case of this which the adult partiesare not in joint custody of each others children, the stipulations of the otheroption in grand theft auto are quite possibly undermined or over sighted toresponsible action needed taken by one or both of the adult parties to fatedcustody not theirs for the time period. It is not an opinion, but rather theliability of challenge all three minors legal custody to exclude possible thirdparty being the awarded factor, for resolve issued a fourth party logicallybeing involved when not present, nor property related to the incident, least achild whom rightfully would like to know someones improper baby sitting is nottheir divulged right, but their parents involved correction with the localauthorities on their own bewitched behalf of state representation. The deformation of characterization ofirresponsible parents gone unnoted then would like to should it come to thefork already planted in the road past of a divorce case challenging custody inabusing hearing would just mind I interject statement of preposterous medicaladvisory due to a cry that no one but myself has taken the time to understandover the years is how a doctor may feel the need to x-ray a injury that is notso visible externally and denounce the medical aspirations of said company whomhave had advantage over a diploma study of Advanced Biology after all, it was atelevision program of information that explained a animals cry and instinct ofthe parents to provide that helped me understand how a E.R room would havechanged the rest of my life in breathing, and unknown later pains that manifestin getting older as well likely cosmetically, had the bone fracture in my facebeen set with respects to a professional opinion of emergency. Before judgmentof a scientific blood related fact come to hand, please involve the bestphysicians partys opportunity to speak before reprimanded ignorance claimknown scientific fact of parent and legal appeal, of what may neither be truthas well.

Personal Topic:

One D.W.I. and allD.U.I upon my record reduced to one D.U.I. on account of character ofdeformation lien of federal officers driving.

Opening Argument:

The actions of federal D.N.R. officers placed in motionduring a B.W.I. become the course of two possible routes to option with nobetter scenario presented a choice was made that continues to defer a characterjudgment and officers good civic oath and duty with making the wrong decisionssuch as those I made by driving friends in what would be my only D.W.I. to dateas well as inopportunity directly placed on actions of poor authoritiesdecisions that may risk future safety of their performances.

Additional Addendum:

Going over the B.W.I. specifically in memory how it wentwhich enabled the decisions of D.N.R. officers that will effect three otherfederal decisions in authorities positions during their performance and projectjudgment on my behalf to wade the options in a state of inebriation, always afalse safety, but hindering change, giving prelude to multiple D.U.I. that forinstance are not misinterpreted but are infect side effect false for thefindings at each driving violation.

Going over each of the three other cases, where a officialof brown jurisdiction became involved, also retained bad judgment and/or ismissing from the record, pertaining as well, to two K9 officers, whom by inbestow pass, largely instinct the passive actions of the job as allcommunication not just a false or true query to the entire picture like that ahuman may find himself error on action to the best safety performance ofeveryones abilities to cooperation.

Going over the D.U.I. and similarities to passive nature ofquestionable slide scale safety first as a constant reminder that the linewalked liens to one direction if certain said influence was or was not aprojection normality more features then a irrational judgment for somethinglike energy or pain that consistently effects, and the ladder, a high feelingthat is physiological that may cloud judgment

Going over due to the actual fate in play set forth by theB.W.I. and what decision had the double driving effect been the wrong of avariant few ways the situation could be handled, how this effects the directconsole of ones self in a inebriated or non, such as authorities performingduty, decision making spite the better option for both parties involved in asituation of care taking before officers arrive, and care taking as theofficers assess arrests and evidence to the initial charge.

Going over the facts the officers may well had known theinjunction they are using is not the best viable option to their conscious andnoted by their lack of reporting where as missing facts present not in therecords so far as I am able to query, which is a sign of their escape thesituation they may know is not wrong but not finding the right solution totheir continue, thus willingly, under character deformation leave out portionsrelevant to the case, such as a initial stopping troopers name or involvementall together, for a pull over that is passed to local authorities.

Going over for good reasons what the K9 units have held upas their duty in performance of last options to spot check the officer in courtfor the case, least responsible probability that the humans on the cases havedone said single time duty per case, and really get what is allowed for theirsigning oath, obtained in cherish out values with their rewarding sensibilityto by so loyal with out these distress calls.

Closing Statement:

It is with out a doubt that the facts and cases have beenrevisited and sets in motion proper revocation of initial findings for thebetter of each party involved such that the court and police as well as citizengoverning systems have justified the conclusion of this said case, providing proofevident the fact not opinion of deformation in character judgment on Nicholassentire D.U.I. and D.W.I. record that which have been set straight with theproviding reduction to concerns well kept and that future involvement upon theroad of this wake are properly adjusted in first time patterns and not takingup time and mental health of individuals involved.

Personal Topic:

Given factsexhibited in hypothesis form in-between open and closing sentences during acase, the following is a case argument for obstruction to a wall as unjust tobe listened with out concern for discernment a must:

Opening Argument:

Hearing through walls or any other solid object may not beheard in origin context.

Hypothesis Theories:

1. A wall is solid

       Experiment:With a solid, such as a rock, attempt to move your hand through it,record finds.

       Control: With a non solid, such as water,attempt to move your hand through it, record finds.

       Test:With a wall, attempt to move your hand through it, record comparisonfindings.

2. Sound waves travel

       Experiment: Half way between Point A and C,clock a cap gun bang sound at point A for how long it takes the sound to reachpoint C.

       Control: On point A, clock a cap gun bang atpoint A for how long it takes to hear the sound at point A.

       Test: Clock a cap gun bang sound at point A forhow long it takes the sound to reach point C.

3. Solid objects dampen sound

       Experiment:Sound a cap gun near a solid object with hollow interior, and microphoneon the exterior opposing side of the cap gun.Record volume findings.

       Control:Sound a cap gun near a solid object with a hollow interior andmicrophone on the interior. Recordvolume findings.

       Test:Sound a cap gun with out a solid object and microphones where the solidobject was when were in interior and exterior placements. Record volume findings.

4. Sound collides with solid objects

       Experiment:Sound a cap gun off in an interior small room and microphone inside aswell and record the findings of reverb echo.

       Control: Sound a cap gun off outside of any roomin wide open spaces and microphone record the findings of reverb echo.

       Test: Sound a cap gun off in an interior smallroom with a hanging tinfoil sheet next to the gun and microphone record anyreverb echo of room and tin.

5. Ears hear sound

       Experiment: Record for one straight minute and during theminute has someone cap gun behind you with a comment express when you hear it,record findings.

       Control:Record for one straight minute and during have no sound of a cap gun,behind you but raise no at the end of the minute if non-heard.

       Test:Record for one straight minute and during that minute has someone capgun behind you more then once and comment yes whenever you hear the gun, recordfindings.

6. Two sounds maybe only one

       Experiment: Drop a metal can to hit the floorand record the sound that it makes, and then record the findings.

       Control:Drop a plastic cup to hit the floor and record the sound that it makes,and then record the findings.

       Test:Drop a plastic cup and metal can to hit the floor at the same time andrecord the sound, recording the findings.

Hypothesis Facts

• In space sound bounces around off solid objects in plenty directions that change course which modifies travel over time in which an ear hears
• Travel over time in collision makes division that makes new sounds through adding the deflection itself to the ear by latency arrival may two.

Closing Statement:

Walls most certainly cause obstruction to sound waves thatmay bounce and combine two make one at the point of hearing in which words combineand English it self may discern, thus unable in context to be clearlyunderstood.

Personal Topic:

Level of attentionto projected under craft with battery vehicle.

Opening Statement:

Intended to provide a basic overview of speech 101 lessonsas told to me to credit the achievement of attention.

Additional Addendum:

In speech a very basic lesson is that of ways to grabsomeones attention, indefinite to know you have or have not, and ways toimprove attention getting. Singularlygetting one persons attention is a critical first step in component to seekingthe crowds attention. Knowing you haveones attention includes the direction they are facing, to or fro and also eyecontact, which one may have with you but their mind maybe still wandering notin attention. When you have directvisual reference they are facing you, a similarities to the importance ofspeech with in communication that also hold true in dire needs of calling forhelp is that possibility they are not still in attention. Using your visual ability and audio abilitymay still be needed, stuff like flailing your arms profusely would if a cry forhelp meant life or death, yelling of course, and using the word help, asimilarity to a start of a speech gathering the crowd to quiet may need someloud gestures for restlessness unsettled.Audio response is also attractive in calling for help, but not so muchin speech, as all silent is the audio help to deliver a clear uninterruptedmonologue. So in calling for help onedoes not respond we keep trying until we get that response in return. Sometimes in speech the crowd tends to getboard, and eyes begin to wander again.These are all indicators that the speech is not so thoroughly delivered,reinstruction of quiet or attention may be required considering the speechmaybe critical importance when the president is speaking, or relief effortslocally need organization. Illustrating this there is the negative to attentiongetting which is inversely as effective in drawing the response but not keepingthe attention. Tactics of this meansconsists of stopping what youre doing to get attention when the attentionturns to. Using a very low voice thatdoes not make it concisely hearing thus the turn to attention is also neededwhere as, sometimes direct the attention is not the same true they may alsohear while directed not at the speaker.Being out of range visually so that when attention arrives you furtherback out to hidden easily is the visual equivalent, to the low volume audioattention to halt. When you visuallyplace people in scenery they may disappear easily from obstruction, variousways like a car may use gas speed to do so the same, or just the door closing,but is as not human itself to hear. Atthese negative types of visual and audio reference to attention getting, thereis the human response of which a scenery or car is not capable of thus leavinghollow remnants bestowed upon. Quitepossibly, a kinder tide of mental illness of hearing voices that repeat forsimply bouncing off in defection. Nonethe less, a entire day span of this in constants as if it were which wasappointed in a health purpose negatively adverse on the tale, thesolidification of a repeated attempt to see or get attention response goes without and then it is continued when truly not found and emotion drives the soughtout. Humans in emotion tend to stay in emotion.Someone missing another person and nowhere to be found does not give uphope so easily. Someone with solidcomponent mental illness retardation may be physically missing their ability toreason check every visual non condoning possibility. Someone evading as if was loss not, yet stillnot with another in unjust goodbye, may cause a lot of damage unnecessarily andby no fault of their own.

Closing Argument:

There is not enough supporting evidence to consider therequesting party was properly addressing the respondent.

Personal Topic:

Identity Theft ofthe Most Try

Opening Argument:

Aim to clearly outline ways identity theft by trait of vetsis far more harsh and able when and should be taken literal is definite use.

Additional Addendum:

A parent has a right to sign for his children so long asthey are minor of age. A parent also hasthe right to deny or allow his children into opportunity of what could be earlyownership assets such as child acting does by the child gaining an income. The relative of any family member is a in house opportunity that minors are not able avoid inclose quarters, and neither a parent raising their children. A parent names neither their children, not anill literal unable to walk nor cognitive reasoning mentally yet developed inmemory. When is it that with the adventof the Junior and Senior suffix to names is going to be added to the MinnesotaName change form which only includes three parts of a name, where as thetechnical Junior and Senior in fact in case in hand represents a fourth atexpense of three parts of a name, being the first, middle and last as exactlythe same, then and only then is the Junior and Senior relevant. When a parent names their child and uses theJunior and Senior it may or may not be intent that they are the same name onpaper at any given time of their life, or belated to be a interchangeableposture to use of services one or the either has enlisted with the name, but incase in hand, by ways of naming conventionally of the children there is farmore then one sign of this likely intent manifesting even so if did not, andwhether expressed right away or late, the proverb of the naming of the child inthe beginning is at fault to identity theft.In Nicholas family there is Thomas John Forystek Junior his brother andSenior, his father and as well a cousin of his Nicole K. Forystek which non similarto Nicholas R. Forystek if could suffix, yet is slightly similar to Nicole M.Forystek a deceased of his mothers first pregnancy whom was aborted in acontroversial 3rd trimester procedure at 11months old. It is likely hoof of the naming ability ofThomas John Forystek and Mary K. Forystek that Thomas John Forystek is in foridentity theft he can not instant manage the escape of, just as his father,would they both, par one sets it up, the other the use of, an account namedNich0ls. While Nicholas did express theword for username he added a zero not to be cool but pass on what he did notbelieve his brother would do, which he then asked him to not make one, becausehe wouldnt use it, is when his brother proceeded to give it to his father foruse. A man who by his own childs name,quite likely planed to would do such perverse tactics in identity theft. As blood related, there is not need toexpress asset least the child know about it and it is in the development of,where as a care taking foster situation one that child abuse warrants prison,there is a reason to trick the child into thinking your blood related such thatyou do not have to explain their accompanied assets, such as the money stolenfrom Nicholas and the guilty party of use in his name, just as the man wouldname his son himself as himself after himself, and to be continued as identitytheft for expression of dealt.

Closing Statement:

The mans father figure, a close member of his growing up,outright has no conscious or sorry for the use of others names in overwriting uniquenessby reason of naming them himself with exhibited use undeniable.

Personal Topic:

Environmentalcleanup uniquely for the first time will occur with a class of attraction whengone on unknown; in two party biases their time better well spent not theenvironment timing defense.

Open Statement:

When unknown factors occur that can be harmful to community,humans or the environment itself as a quality of life plant or otherwiselivable probabilities, a clean up effort may be going on prior to actual maintainingclean up of the larger issue.

Additional Addendum:

Large or small, everything is a learning experience and weare not always right, sometimes making effort in irreversible non permanentsolutions to the best of our ability.Efforts unfinished include two that are not known by each other where asone finalized another in a better permanent solution. Efforts are man made and only human, they donot include environments state of truly happening with or with out our guidanceresults in pursuant of when the calamity is disastrous or otherwise detrimentalto our health as a union. Before asequential likely hood of another solution, not readily available isactualized, a emergency act is in motion when we citethe effects it has harming our health. These solutions liner like a casemanagement in court, have people in the parallel attempting to react in urgencywhere needed, and think in long term for emergency that is with out reversiblechange. Thus the component of nonresolve or less then capable full resolve has a lasting effect until lightmaybe shed and that is only as depth as responsibility where we may never havenon for non issues confined to out grasp of knowledge, also rather suchprofound reasoning and would be conclusive solutions that they are laterallyunattained by; individuals who have by in numbers agreed upon their reasoning asolution whether or not it is little to large help, still non resolve, andparties who believe that while unknown not a spoken token by the other party,still no sign of relief continues their personal experience to distrustfalsified resolve. Providing twoparallel realities on a liner gauge, a offsetting as such maybe religiouslysought in support, or criminally foreign in attack, ladder effect is ignorant unknownto logical arrogance bestow. A eventualevent may happen with only the parallel experience and not he environment thatwhich is acceptance, with out grievance for the venture of urgency having aeffect, of that which is also denial to distain sought out resolve in whethergod or man, a environment distrust that community wont let down their fight forregaining grounds of a happier health to all and then to such goes thespoils. These spoils may never arise resultingof a allocation of what it is in extreme environmentissues or very little everyday things we dont do for ourselves, the reason towhich party you may be on the side of in same time frame of environmentoccurrence. A third logical external tothe detrimental effects as a party also is liaison to either of theseformidable parties responses to the quality of environment of which, may enterthe refute and choose their side, well in fact, not so true for the first ofunknown health may prosper well more, with a solution to the a sure thing,graces.

Closing Argument;

Either of these two parties cites an example of the cause,and has an opinionated bias to their actions over the time of an environmentalhealth hindering hindsight their actions foregoing the option in the same.

Personal Topic:

Child support caseof the business kind in a draw out judgment of courts appealing decision wellincludes council confined in preface case if opinion.

Opening Statement:

Contempt of court holds up tilt of cases when in pinballapparent the pusher waiver of wins so while outside the mends you need see thejudge, not a third party to fuzz detectors of humans preaching their childprotectors.

Additional Addendum:

Go over major prospects of ways court is foreigndiplomatically under fire in a war, for establishing none use with in its ownsystem. Holding up court as not regular sick or holiday paid vacationssimilarly characterizes a all left or all right standard starting first inhistory to resolve of reach the pinnacle combats new case entry by relate tocase agenda at hand. In two partysupport of playing with themselves, excuse the expression, the condemn it thesame for ways dates and individuals must be placed in harmony. Go over no fight is rightfully allowed incourt, plenty of sue is just that when involved two parties as individual nonbusiness defined inanimate objects of a influence, such as the environment,sometimes bites, seemingly a fight but one for all, all afford when may casemanagement uncover interest in revisiting with out reason of reproach. Two parties in a dispute such as that in sueone another is a technical fight and while with words appreciating the courtsappeal, like behaved adults, it is still neither a will enough to peak ajudges topic response decision on case priority for not lasting what maybeplaying with themselves and/or hold up built tilts. Tilts like in pinball are only capable of byforce from what the ball touches, thus the parent object to the ball, capableof continued tilt, when with a lobbyist in part together nor neither to dowhether or not holds out by off, the ball then has no control in single player,two person pinball playing push the machine toggling the ball at unrest orcapable itself reach the decision to play at all. These are technical non use of the courtswith the court resources and a Judge sitting center stage does not capable havenot already entered in standing position to court itself, and likely oninvasion by silent enemy, this is probable easy waivers for foreign attacks onU.S.A. soil, as well, preprocessed standard ignorant of unaware to their causemay deemed better, come and go type of repeat case daily habit.

Closing Argument:

There is a definite out of play indicator by the judge,and therefore placing the opening statements at peril to the factor of theentry requirements that such in business it is considered late child supportpayments only resolved by representative backing out of the case to concludetheir dissolving of for selfish purpose that neither the judge apprehends fornor the pretends poor the perquisite payments when once before cases as suchwere closed, the judge importantly pertains to business and the adult ablepresent a statement, arraigns with out retainer, case in hand, pointing noright even when just words to ask a judge to finish their fight against theyouth whom with they known control is the courts too appealing.

Personal Topic:

Some peoples timebetter spent in their own allocation must not be reasonably those of disasterefforts cleaning up, or neither profit of a natural disaster in effort onestime.

Opening Statement:

During events of disasters whether unknown or seen, thoseefforts of the kind cherish well before the proposed determination of timeallotted the same for all individuals who place will in their purposing.

Additional Addendum:

Priority of natural disasters may not be known or advancedof human health may always see more in areas not predestine but human increation. When there is a potential offbalance those too may also not me known by most but certainly some symptoms ofmental illnesses illustrate when a person or people become in need ofhelp. The signs alone may be the helpfor the guidance where as someone doesnt ignore the initial but not potentialraised community problem someone could be exhibiting. This like habit can go on in nature but thereis also posture of whom helps who in emerges apriority. Possibilities that involvementare ones aspiration of time are to be set aside for anothers, and likely thatsomeone is a hospital respondent or emergency respondent like the police orfiremen, are both time consuming and most likely a choice whether demand orbothered to enforced. When we speak ofthe environment a similarity to a chemical spill, verses a company dumping, or a already chemical company, this maybe going on with littleor potential large risks for long run that is not immediate in operationknowledge of the future of. Consider theincident it is, and consider three parties of action, and three parties outsideaction whom have voice. One party is thecompany, another two are the public, one is ignoring with out listen, andanother is concerned. One company maybecome concerned should the concern approach, but one thing for certain of theproblem being at problem to the future is that the outcome is benefits tohealth whether mental or physical.Should the company not become on board and concern still continues, theignoring maybe made aware and join help efforts of petitions, abiding to threeother non exhibiting parties are the same parties at all these types of healthrisk events that maybe not seen or will be eventually those in history like aoil spill in the cleanup effort stage. To propose others whom ultimately didnthave involvement one way or another is not happening at events unknown in whatmay better the environment still just ideas uncreated. To be concerned and not the company ispossibly the ill fated reign check of what was payment to the invalid partythey would rather had heard. What isneither of these are the mental issues of those who take effort to gain on theevents using the damage of the down fall in light of the reaction not changingor really efforts of a foreign outbreak of war in anothers country. So much so that it becomes the child supportcase for selfish payments unvalued in efforts maybe neutral to non existentbefore they are head on damaging with providing no the information of enlightenrather just chalking it up to unexplained,, with out haste, later in historicalis just a boat spilled, those who had their effort to provide no changewatching along maybe not the best metal status of child support in extremityand therefore proprietors of mental disorders.Illness aside, disorder remains no orderly, unless maybe corrected butenvironment posing a challenge has no time for let another make the challengeharder for speaking unknown depths of the solution or know what is happeningbeing a way t know how the fix comes about.

Closing Argument:

There is capitalizing however so be fit the time of an actfor bipartisan parties for to be with in their own respect supporting their ownchildren neighbor or environment otherwise that does not reflect all will ofothers over a same time period, more then one party may have spoken for theirpiece forever held in non help the ordering of mental abilities over their lifein crutch of environmental abusive, ignorance, strategy or war.

Personal Topic:

Ensure of issuesreused insurance instance of case definition as seconds neither commits personscontinue with said names portrayal in predisposition carry propone know willdefined nuisance firm.

Opening Argument:

Then it is with out grace that I declare my will be assumemy name with in a case of any due process has process before thrown out,affords fort, and with out a doubt as adult, arraign or summons on width outdetainee nor bench warrant, the ability when and if case opening for interestendurances, council then presents as two more parties of public kept asdiscreet as transcripts to conclude a firm basis of said propone knowallowances library becomes two by in defined interest handled fiscal incumbentto reason of cases made interest the individual.

Additional Addendum:

To appropriate funding of monetary cash note value misspenton what the interest of the issue has means for, the case must be made for theentire time results of needs met while the providing funding is set apartindifferent from able use for any funding, but never spend with any fundingfor. To show up providing two or morecases in chain by named individual as receipted, the health of the courts haveby in operation concluded a propone know for raster knowledge there of and notsaid inclusion, happens to be width out doubt a intrusion of securities prospectedby the courts own contempt with including the public or defining propone knowat the risk of including real situations, there in a clause of war, allowedrespectable business may thus in private courtship, has a error of doubt to thevalidity of one or more cases continuum, also suffered one more expense at anygiven time, with out charge or arrest, maintained on soil of United Statescourtship contended by none interaction well with or whether tricked, where inmight due process be trove.

Closing Statement:

To set apart money providing proof needs of a unit togetherbest just reasons other then said court interest in appeal the issue of ensure,unit or otherwise does not captivate nor include by advance real name allowancefrom case to case more for lack of unofficially delivering a providing featureof court case itself, sequentially has a propone know effect when the councilallows continuance.

Personal Topic:

Child support tobe paid by cases where corporations become the financial backing project proceedingsoccurring with out the neither further defined representatives nor courtappealing mental illness.

Opening Argument;

Those cases in hand of corporations that must back out butare given case management by the judge before doing so and defined to return orneither accept there in what is being neglected is a child support on adulthood of their own post contestant to the return in reference have not also theillustration of reasonably mentally ill capacity as defined by in time oflengthily drawn out open cases that do not cease to occur with out respectingthe terminology of child support is contingent on the subject representatives.

Additional Addendum:

In order to lead to an arrest one must had presented thearrest where in by there fore the arriving party requesting was lead to suchwhether citizen or local police department, the police must finalize thearrest. Arresting parties and orselfless acts to do so and by way in which query the FBIs program of fundingawarded to any information leading to an arrest then by in most part isdepartment funding that likely cycles amongst themselves. However in the selfless event at whichsomeone maybe named on the list themselves and decided to turn themselves inthey for when which what one holds going in to jail, becomes what they areholding coming out. This is not the casewith prison. Jail is about a populationcontrolling force and time out, while prison is about a career continuancerespect and time in. It is with reasonyou must loose something in prison, while in jail you may have artifacts notlarger then usually what is on your person, this can include a deceased loveone in a urn of a small necklace of ash. Therefore, providing child support on the wayout, handed back your artifacts. Thus say a career wanted individual posted asreward for information leading to an arrest has a change of heart and decidedhe will be turning himself in, before he goes he allows himself time to tie uploose ends and provide support for a long term to his children perhaps, or evenelder mother whom he hopes will be remaining supporting of his children when hegets out and everything resumes the way it were, then is false accredited acommentary on rights to population control that which is stronger then andneither career, the suffering respects of jobs and tasks that we perform on theday to day, a reason jail is dedicated specifically apart from prisons in theirdifference. In jail unless dire, ordoing life, you do not get medical help and dental attention as well. Absent of population and by a non open keypolicy, these things are required to be of life supported first and foremostbefore arriving that you should be healthy enough to sustain your sentence. Then as so much, a parent or a spouse may doon absolutely belittled to a object, such as a urn with ash or a diamond ring,these artifacts are remaining property in a perfect world with out clericalerror or corrupt P.D. theft, that as objects are not really able supportchildren nor themselves. So a selflessact of entry fond of a exit goes with out reason that even when pocket cash isallowance to jail and/or received when you exit, the selfless man then shallnot be overseer or two parties parent to the jail, receiving rewarded money,even if going to the police, by his action of entry even in unannounced toreceiving, is at fault of the child supporting adulthood of a terminalpotential flaw in the system where as awarded money in custody, shouldformidably be the guardian company of actual children and not indirectlythrough police funding a continuing cycle of award money challenged.

Closing Statement:

By truth and not unaccredited discernment the funding poolpardons level of incriminated intent of children and adults for police fundingand there fore should be taken as literal by courts when in which a jailerspocket is purposed to awarded funding with out sacrificing the cost ofcommunity childhood development for police department substitution.

Personal Topic:

Child supportcases on adult hood are that of taste and not mental disorders for which by wayward.

Opening Statement;

The bi-partisan projection of will of ways lets the absenteeof support to back out and reenter concluded of case course when while mentaldisorders are prophetic only to their cause and not by entrapment, black mail,nor concluded allowance to care for in certain second party for which waveswill not justify the end of the environment needs therefore concludes a mentaldisorder in un-orderly adjustment of their supportive child selfishly..

Additional Addendum;

Hypothesis needs to be drawn out for chemicals lighter thenair being that of the length of time of god and the human ear of lie, thatwhere way which is not waste exit providing when has run its cell body course. Two chemicals need be cited for proceedingparties to contend of case for cold war projection in position being a civildispute matter, and whether war not when the fruits of the loins of man islighter then air as well in all movements human thy kingdom come to be arrivedat this juncture with or with out God, the sciences of life, and public affairsin foreign admission. Cite twochemicals, less dense then air by way of hypothesis fact based provision, and ahypothesis to recreation of controlled test to provide proof semen as well andthe human nature is least weighted among as.

Closing Argument;

The H-Bomb of the cold war still in effect attacking ourcivil selves is by no way in direction come for a mental school of the patheticself loathing win or less in a environmental adult support disastrous then byway mental disorderly displaced the children in your representational halts forproceeding with out due process catches up.

III: Case Flowchart