New Testament Bible Study

1. Grammar
1. The obvious read of the New Testament bible, hereafter referred to as bible, has an English lexicon and alphabet use in USA but it does not appear to follow both grammar and communicative standards in English both in visual and mental conveyance, not with out an exception of where the majority rule of nearest strict grammar occurs in single sentencing in Psalms. Not so much like a child or queer, with scribbling all over the place no uniform layout, or every uniform lay outs its mind can pretend the book spans. Yet though, if you were say around humans often and writing a book based on no scholarly education, or even if say for instance you believe your soul was priory a spirit animal, and have tendencies to mind, you could possibly find this book to be a alternative to be with and not discredit, but ajar non the les sin radical play that suits different needs with unbound grammar. Not so serious, or really is compared to a baby with no rhyme or reason just coloring on paper. Never the less, a format to be sure retains through out the book.
2. One of the main things about the difference in grammar I believe to have grave importance to speech by trait is the way in which capital lettering is used. Most common on very short words, that has a trending theme of relate possible to also pronouns such as He and Me. I think this is due to an animal limitation, and I dont now which specie but it is safe to believe cat and dog, as their very communicative with humans and part of the protected class in the food chain with human in court. Also they have a limitation in communication by design, that says vocally, they only ever get to express one word but mentally with intake they probably learn like a baby with in means to understand language eventually by listening, however in the natural order of instinct because of the limitation they need to communicate faster in repeats, which places something like a first gesture at the top of the list of single word to get right consistently over others, that being a name, a pronoun, or in the capital lettering sense, a noun on words relating to persons with pronouns likely.
2. Structure
1. Chapters are for the most part similar to any other book, but each page format is in columns, all be it neatly as the only thing to I suppose understand about it, rather then messy or in some other derivative. I believe that has some significant meaning. Possibly because cats and dogs as example before, this is in line with what is said about cats sight that makes string so fun, they see based on motion. So having more up and down rather then left to right, caters to the tail of balance when motion obscures and upright, would be where the tail wags to recapture balance, short, worded, move on down.
2. Each sentence or group of words is bulleted to direct reference anywhere in the book with relatively simple as can be numerology. It is not in the paragraph form as much as it is in different by the same nature of chapter, cluster of sentences a paragraph, and then another, and so on to chapter. To get anywhere in the book like a quick reference look up, the sentences are numbered and only go two tiers deep, not three, such as 2:3 and not 4:2:6 making for an effective system, and not as much a paragraph indent is or spacing between paragraphs.
3. Chapters
1. Dogs naturally are the more adept to respond to more then one word, cats most likely friendly will come well by their name, a lot wont do much more by words, I dont think its their fault or ignorance, I think their just slow in a sense of always looking too cool is really truly is how we see their smart, in not bothered easily by training to their own change and life and it comes on their watch just rightly introduce. I believe the more they become understanding in humanly interacting the more that smart ignorance turns to childish wonder for not stubbed their toe so to speak, but I do think they have a incredible ego looking face until then. Least a gender, in most cats and dogs on appearance. Dogs love to play fetch, their a lot more robust, and intrusive like dont know the size of themselves when happy and such. So I think the beginning of the bible starts out with fetch in the human orderly. As if dogs have began with reorder their humans, understanding how we tend to like to have them assigned to owners, in literal, begets the dog is expression a list of who is whose owner like its know their own and talk about it amongst friends. Life really is happier with a heel because their communicating and enjoy humans. They also have to fetch humans to go outside. At a dog park if consistently going with their owner it might look well like the length of the intro wording in the bible one dog recalling and going over who is who in their mind at the park.
2. There is a red text early on in the bible chapters where the names are of pronouns common to human more so then not or a regular word if not capitalized. I really like this idea, for some reason, it does not exist any other color for a reason and does exist in the New Testament pretty much only in that way. My .understanding of it is how cats are called king of the jungle or top of the food chain, theyve had to kill or be killed against them all at one time or another where no other specie has the bodily design to say that like cats do, also wolf in dog, similar thing a wild pack in the dog family, or dog in the wolf family, that is fierce relentless hunting using their own god given bodies and nothing more. Therefore up-close and personal and even fights man one on one and can vouch for wins, sad as it is, both specie cat and dog have a advanced human side to them that they coexist better then any other animal specie do as house pets using the same stuff we do to nap and eats in the same kitchen, take them out to go potty every time. I think the red letter text is their seeing a collection that human clean up, perish selves. Their more like, rather catalog as do, as if humans are neat and they have a meat rack of the dead ones in their hearts more then actually watches the blood by well senses. Look silly? Well not food. Something they could admire to morn for if has them a pronoun care. Also important for the next two chapters after pronouns. Romans and Acts. If there is human meat rack in their heat, Romans are the hung deceased people that are robots for the Acts coming.
3. It took me some time before I ever picked up a new or (sorry to say still havent) Old Testament and read it. I think the reason is because the new testament was always the more available one to me, at church or at home, and the old testament seemed to hide, and it troubled me eventually hearing all these normal repeated bibles stores and I finally wondered where are they getting these stories? Ive seen the bible and it reads nothing like such. I didnt understand it was the Old Testament. I still havent read it to learn it is maybe 100% English grammar in comparison, but the very beginning I recognized hearing before and it dawned on me. I wanted say that because of how I come to read the new testament is when I had time to sit around in a place unfamiliar, not home, and with my pocket bible my mother brought to me I finally wanted to know what it was all about and just buckle and read it knowing its not so coherent, I was seeking where are the stories exactly. Much to my surprise I did not see them and didnt worry about it so much as I was focused on a book I dont understand as Im reading. Yet Psalms is different of a second as they are English sentences like words of wisdom and sayings to fruit the nature of your day. Before reading, I every once in a while liked to grab the bible and separate out Psalms with my fingers and flip through the pages and shove in my other finger to land on one random and read it for the days inspiration. But before this section is Revelations. I knew I wasnt understanding the book I kept reading, I knew Psalms would be different at the end but first Revelations and the word itself make me believe in a high spirit like awaking or informing myself, and truly, it reads very different then the rest of the book Im not sure what it is possibly the I references but it felt like bump in the whole read as tracks of the chapter, and when I finished the book I was not satisfied. I had fixed a reading block I had in high school just before high school ended and did homework after graduation for myself, and this book didnt make it any easier my thoughts that Im not retaining what I read. So I read it again right after I finished. That profoundly did something with Me as if I needed Revelations first in the I sense and rereading it changes to Me or vice versa. I still didnt get it. But those two pronouns sunk on Romans which is early in the book matching the exit to revelations a first time.
4. After Romans and Acts are what I believe to be the sects, and in their own words, for some reason I like Galatians the best, just by the ring of it is like universe or galaxy feeling verses space, or heaven. I think once one gets to Philemon it is like it sounds but in Romans sense of closet, file, but man, a compliment the beginning chapters and there after partial to King James and furthering a connection in bring it all together strong named chapters. Consistently making it up and around with Romans and off into whatever will bring.

What is gravity?

Gravity in itssimplest explanation in one word is light in proof. How then are objects drawnto each other by light, such as people to Earth, and the Earth to the sun?Lets break down some facts about light. One fact is that it is the fastestthing known to man kind in travel. Another fact is that from a source I amomnipresent like sound, which starts at the source and spans out in alldirections. But there is a difference, and that leads to another fact that itis also all encompassing. If you think of a grid of any number of X, Y and Zunits on an axis, it exists on every point as all encompassing where really thegrid of points is infinite, but to illustrate well just say it is like a matrixand it exist on every point of the matrix. One difference from sound is that itis invisible in travel. That all encompassing aspect of it, unless obstructedby matter, will not be seen until it is obstructed on the face of some matter,whether it is clouds that it can keep going through, or a hard piece of steelthat it would only illuminate the surface, in between and how we see with oureyes, it does not show in the travel of. Sound however does with the allencompassing, it is omnipresent in originates from the source, and standing adistance away when the wave passes you by you will hear it as to say it ispresent in the all encompassing aspect noted by travel. Of course soundcontinues to keep going in how a volume designates what is heard is brief asdoes not remain. Light, remains, a constant in algebra is how it is measured ofits traveling speed.

Now there is innature, a red-line theory that is very true and exampled in our bodies and inour ground by technology, which touches on a subject of electricity. I dontknow how you think of electricity but I think a lot of people hear about BenFranklin discovering and, my self, I get an impression that it is white fromthe lightening expression. However not true, my mind wants to believe there isa white light traveling on the wires, when it really is invisible as well, butit has a far less travel speed. Now in the world there is computers that run onelectricity and a client server model many are aware of what means, forwhatever reason though a cline server model we are focusing on is how innature, a server red-lines so to speak and literally like the natural body information, derives arteries of fiber optic cable larger in bandwidth where theredline is greatest in the world that trickles down to invisible nerve endingsof clients. This is due to the proposal, when leaving out peer to peer, in aclient server model, the servers uptime as a computer just like a clientspotentially, has the work load and always present responsibility to keep forevery client there fore runs the most load and work and uptime, creating anatural path that is retraced more often then and single client may in themodel. This path repeats and is what is as described the red-line. Centeringaround multiple servers in a area creates a larger need for bandwidth inpipelines laid around the world and exhibits a aortic type of human vain systembut in the Earth with wires and fire optics that just like the human, thelarger veins are near the heart what would be the majority red-line servers ofthe internet use in the very beginning to date.

Electricity,largely invisible like light but runs on a harness of metal and sometime slighttoo, is constricted to the harness. A gravity nature of call for light occursjust as we would want to see, we might flock then to a light source if it everytried leaving and follow it. These computers, are gravitational in light, justas every material that goes into making these server rooms for instance letssay we need to start one, we would draw up form all over the world andmanufactures to make a computer and then bring it to a location and build afacility and have wires running in and out, just as we often do. That is quiteliterally a complex form of gravity because it involved humans. A basic form issuch as the sun. Just one source and it never goes away, and illuminates Earth.If we did not have electricity lights, we would be heavily dependant on thenatural light of the sun, moon and stars quite often. Fire is a light too, thatwe did use in the past before electricity for the times the sun is not over usand we want to see. It too has the same characteristics as alight just likeany, but different at the source just like all are to another whether it isneon gases in a tube, or a burning filament in a bulb. Electricity, as anadvent human created in use, for an energy, that which fire has, and the sunhas, in its primitive form, not too energetic if cant see anything is probablya true fact, so we find ways to improve upon, such as the productivity thatelectrical lights really do bring in vast qualities all over in life. Soneedless to say, we built these complex computers that are just so fun in lightthat we do some amazing stuff with them. For instance in a client server model,there is the issue that hardware breaks down, in theory, over the entire spanof a server model it will have swapped out its hardware nearly potentially 100%for new hardware with out missing a beat on that red-line up time factor. Dueto the complexities of programs and the need for 100% uptime, things likebackup and redundancy is put into play that makes it seamlessly in operatorattendance maintaining these servers health. So amazingly enough, thinkingabout how it jumps hardware potentially to 100% replacement over time, thenthat means nothing but the mind of the invisible light walked itself on theway, like on lily pads that are the hardware and it is a frog. Servers such asthe need for the most propionate uptime have a lack of interface them afterdeveloped. The reason is because light is gravitational and the server has sucha load for each client that it cant spare it, as well, it is room for operatorerror that is unnecessary by deployment so they minimize visual appearance ofthe light and it helps greatly in performance. In that reasoning the source, ahuman mind, is the invisible light traveling with out the body to reachdestinations more gravitational to the advent, which is end clients and more ofin keeping that stable uptime since the beginning of the first server, never ceasedif remains up, to be path repeating more then any individual client whenconstricted to the client server model with each other.

That is acomplex form of gravity of humans in what draws us to do what we want to do andwhy it would move us to move Earth around into complex forms of hardware thatrun software. It doesnt explain the pull from why we cant fly type of gravityand that is what I will to do in explain. As said in visual depiction the sunis a basic form of light, it is just one light that never goes out that isalways in contact with the Earth somewhere at any time. It is like a one pointsource omni directional luminance that we dont see in travel, until it hits asurface. If there is no human is there still a light? Sounds corny like a treefalls in the forest do you hear it, a typical theory question to inspirethought provocative. With light, with out a human, certainly there is light,like a fire, even though Smokey the bear says only you can prevent forestfires! as if we start them, fire has been know not exist with out personsaround, and we only see the damage, that it truly does have a light and goes onwith out anyone around. Other sources are going to be similar. There is noquestion to the amount of natural light sources in the universe as immeasurablein distance and types unknown, in my opinion. As if a star does illuminatesomewhere in the galaxy a human as never laid eyes upon and it would remain, anatural source even if not, the reason is because of its initial touch down aslight itself. That alone is enough for gravitation. In humans one couldchallenge that our eyes really vacuum light and is the reason why looking ineach others pupils they are black as space, or logical void of light which issimilar to light in travel. Upon contact of a matter however, light is as leastof weight as the fastest most omnipresent and all encompassing natural anomalythat any reflection tethers with its own wave by compound nature and it cantpull out from that contact. So upon contact of matter, it literally is senseitself uncontrollably to a reflection tango that which is viewable light itselfto a human, but least all humans or animals, beings, it is gravity in nature oflight can only do and will only do, in over time, at a whole, and that is existeven as they may go out like fires. The vast space existence stretching toinfinity in all directions is impossible to put out or even state that as factthere is, but our own presence is proof. Just like a sun that doesnt stoplighting the Earth or a people that is drawn to the light if had none. So asimple bounce back is a complexity of life itself. I dont know if youve everheard that fires are alive. So true, with energy consumption just like humansdoes. If we only had one lantern, we would surround it and become fire inrunning with the torch. The sun is natures way of showing us it is runningwith the torch. Basic as just one that contacts our earth, but on a sale thatis phenomenally faster then the speed of light, that is measure its lifetime,we of course can not, as dependant on it and it having been here before weexisted in likely question where does it come from? Yet in math in power innumbers adding up, that is nothing least a bounce back and we are in the bounceback with even more bounce backs in a gravitational construct that is light,weighted least of all, in not present in travel and fastest known travel toman, conducting itself with out a tug or pull, but actually only has one waydrive if any, spirit of man, and combining was more such as the reflectionhaving a second wave and direction of path that rubbed the first inbound in theinvisible sense of what is traditional to source something we see.

That in shortestbroad view look at it is what gravity is, it is life and in light life existsalone with out creatures. But we as creatures, certainly move light to muchmore reflection in power of free will and the inspiration to do things thatremains keeping us gravitational to each other and even illustrates a aorticartery of human put into the Earth in how natural red-lines a repeat pathlight.

Even to the 4th power

In equations,light is a constant, and the theory of relativity examples how surfaces arepresent in luminance in the all encompassing, and not the omnipresent, wherelight is a constant variable c. Also with in normal basic math, exists what Iconsider to be strong named constants, for instance, 100 is a strong nameconstant in percentages; it represents a whole unit percent. In division by itmay be just that, in numerology arithmetic division by a number and notrepresentative of a strong meaning. The same is true in exponentials. A numberto the power of three is a cubic measure, so the exponential of three has astrong name of cube. As well, in collapsing of squares is the existence oftriangles. Such that, exponentials collapse with in reason of strong namedefinitions, where as an equal edged 3d cube may be represented as a widthmultiplied by height and then squared to result the power of three by anylength width or height is the same result. This says, that the exponential 3,consists of two 1.5 percents of a single face of a cube squared. So in breakingdown the three in the exponential for a single exponential as portion to astrong name, is like an analogy of exponential to multiplication, if square fortriangle. The same face information of surface area can be viewed in triangleform, expelling the exponential of three capable then to represent theinformation as it has three portions but not three edges to a face that iscubic to a whole 3D cube. With anything described in 3D that is movingindependent of another anything defined confined to a shared in-betweensomething like water or air, and our two objects being rocks, is immediatelypresent the inherit of movement, as being apart from each other, therefore notwith in the same description of matter logically, where as two separate cubicequations may represent the same object. This is where moving forward withexponential may be as is in arithmetic just like understand there of what itrepresents and finding the answer, or it becomes strong named in triangle andsquare collapsing patters from multiplication to exponential in a continuum, thatwhere as in real 3D space, the relativity of any number of objects exist, andsingularly with out relativity, in basic calculations of finding volume, aswell exists a power of 4, that represents the 4th and to the Nth dimension ofany number of objects existing in theory calculations on top of each otherexact in phase shift double quantified. A common saying is two objects cantoccupy the same space at the same time but in math, least the power of four,where they cant, two objects can be calculated in phase dimension independentof each other in a occupied same matrix of time and space in that after thepower of 4 is the power of 5, which binds time and space together betweenrelativity in two to many, and the opposite matter the relatives are in, suchas water or air, being an object itself, not overlapping in dimension but equalto all encumbering around thus.

Two relatives ofthe same time and space can not combine to be simultaneously occupied of thesame time and space with out it affecting the density or sum as a whole, but inmath they may. So to describe that they have already done so in moved a timeand space is to explain they are bordering with a neighbor type of matter thesame way that occupies all other space then the objects expanding intoinfinity. So to better understand lets just start out with the grit and grindthat is less difficult to grasp if you already understand the theory ofrelativity and have had some basic algebra about plugging in numbers, asdescribed in what is gravity? portion above, light does not exist in thetravel. So in E=mc², lets make up some strong named constants forlight, that make sense. Also because we are dealing with either two relativesor two matters that one being a relative and the other being the neighborsurrounding matter, we need to rationalize time and space for each apparent.This will be like ratios. The time of a rock and the time of an air a ratiolike thus time² = air_time : rock_time andthe space for instance like thus space² = air_space : rock_space. Solets start off, with 100 as a 1. Why not, 1 unit of light speed, and as wesaid, the travel is invisible, so lets also try a 0. To debate, what possiblecould there be to balance speed of light is only 1 to any whole, and 0 to stillpresent (but we need to plug that in the equation to really find what wedeserve in check our work), well how about since there will be two matterswhether separate objects same matter or one object and its border neighbormatter like air, lets just represent that with two unit wholes, so we justdouble 1 unit to 2.So thus far we have 0, 1 and 2. The trickiest one to find iswe need to also absent two, but not complete zero, as if there is a unit wholepresent in different such as 2 to 1 is representing of two wholes and notnominal value of a single light speed. So well attempt to keep 1, and zero it,and the logical response is come to the conclusion -1 will do just that inbalance a 0 of 2. If 0:1 is one light whole in travel not seen, but its spaceand time, taking zero space in travel time of one light reaches a face, then a-1:2 is two of them in recognized a unit whole exists already present, butrepresent the second 0:1. Because these are space and time ratios relating to asingle matters even, and the second one as well may not represent equality andstill be described, such as 0:1 = 0:1 is true, but we loose information aboutlight that must be described between two evenly to say that is really 0:1(air)= 0:1(rock) in just numbers, we can say 1:0 is congruent to -1:2, and viceverse the air for rock is no different. Therefore, the congruency holds up tobe in even nature while rearrange them for different ratio expressions, such asput the time of the first and time of the second as a ratio, then the space tospace likewise, like so 0:-1 is congruent to 1:2. Or perhaps negate each otherby the opposed space to the time of each, like thus 0:2 is congruent to -1:1.Then finally, lets make perfect sense of any of these combos by making anequation of relativity for each of the four. We end up with this E=m-1²,E=m1², E=m0² and E=m2². In ratio form ofexpression it would be something like even four, such as [(E=m0²: E=m1²) ≅(E=m-1² : E=m2²)]. With that we can plug in the mass ofone or two mass but not three or four, mass to objects because that wouldinvalidate the ratios, and we may then solve for which E we would like to forproportionate factors if you will but on an exponential level of pairing twomass in real world construct clause.

Upon concludingfinding some E for the equations using the ratios, we will no doubt be comingup with the constant of the even speeds of light at which the objects matter ishorizon to another into infinity around the object. Such as Earth, the solidbelow and the air above, when we go to the coast we see what is a stretch intoinfinity, if we could be really tiny and put ourselves on a rock that fits inyour hand you can logically say, every object has the same view potentially inkeep circling around while looking into the border at which divides the twomatters aspect. Yet in coefficients, there is for every single border, four Econstants, in do the work in check how it is understood, even if the numberscome out equally or just two actually different numbers of 4 total, because theeven is from one anothers matter perspective.

Lets do moregrit and find some two objects matters to work with, that we have knowndensity, and well make up volumes and have the mass for too.